Interview With Jamie Insalaco: Writer/ Director For Will Reading

Written by Luke Barnes

Hey Everyone! I recently had the chance to interview Jamie Insalaco about his film Will Reading. The plot of the film revolves around a group of friends who meet up to help their friends widow find some money their friend has hidden from the IRS. Within the interview we talk, about the meaning of friendship, do it yourself filmmaking and the Coen Brother classic No Country For Old Men

Q: How would you describe this film in a word?

JI: Everything!

Q: Who is your filmmaking inspiration?                                                            

JL: So many! The song drops in where old The Simpsons episodes would drop a musical number (“Marge vs the Monorail”), and the referential comedy of that writers room is certainly an inspiration. I appreciate Kevin Smith’s indie can-do “Why not?” spirit – and YouTubers showing how much they could do with so little really got me going. Will Reading is full of homages to other movies.

Q: What was your catalyst for making this film?        

JI: I knew I wanted to make a movie and I also knew I’d have to do it myself – so the situation dictated which story treatment I would develop into a script and that eventually became Will Reading.  The runner up was just too ambitious: it revolved around a wedding.  Too many locations, too many costumes, too many extras… but it was kinda similar in the respect that it would have a long dinner scene and a fight as the climax.  I don’t think I’d ever make a movie like this again in terms of no crew, extreme limitations on the script and so forth.

 Q: What was the message behind this film?                                        

JL: I think the viewer can take a few different ideas from the movie… and I guess I prefer to let them pick! One message that comes from the character journeys is “Know thyself.”  At least for Steve and Tom. For Dave and Wendy, it’s more of a “Give Trust a Chance” situation.  The movie takes place after the Great Recession economic downturn, so that certainly influences the messaging and colors a lot of what’s going on, how people are reacting to their situations and what the movie is saying about life at this time in the twenty first century in this little pocket of the United States

Q: Friendship is a key theme of the narrative in Will Reading, how would you say your film tackles this theme, what are its intentions?

JL: Relationships are always tricky.  As opposed to family, when it comes to relationships we choose – romantic or platonic – maybe we expect or at least want them to work perfectly.  And when they don’t, we end up with these “I thought I knew you” ideas floating around in our heads. What does it say about me that I chose this? Particularly here in Will Reading, Steve wants his relationship to go back to the way it was with Wendy when they were teenagers.  That’s a big ask. Wendy needs to get back to a place where she can trust Dave – the nature of these relationships have to change so they can move forward – that’s the thing we’re really trying to show here.

Q: What would you do if you found a large amount of lost or hidden money?

JL: I’d probably leave it where I found it!  I’ve seen NO COUNTRY FOR OLD MEN too many times. The line, “At what point would you quit bothering to look for your 2 million dollars” is burned into my brain! A large amount of money will always be missed, there are ALWAYS consequences to any action – the bigger the action, the bigger the consequence.  My answer is NO COUNTRY!  Everybody go watch NO COUNTRY.  Leave the money where you found it!

Q: Sequels or future filmmaking plans?

 JL: A sequel is highly unlikely but not completely off the table.  It’d be more of a spinoff rather than a Will Reading 2: On the Move direct sequel.  I have a short in the works and as far as features go, a horror movie and a “one last job” movie – one of which will probably be my next indie feature, unless something drastically changes!

Q: If you could go back in time to when you were first starting out as a filmmaker what advice would you give yourself?  

JL: Be bolder. Drink more coffee and keep going.  There were shots I wanted in Will Reading but they were too technically difficult to pull off by myself. Now, I have the experience and understanding to execute them – think it through. “There’s probably a way to cheat that in post if I plan it out right on set.”

Q: Any funny on set stories?

JL: Sometimes we’d get giggling and couldn’t stop.  I would hand out bottles of water as a mini break, to try and alter the mood. From then on, if anything went wrong, the cast would suggest I hand out water – like, if the battery on the camera died: “Water will fix this.”  Someone couldn’t get through a long bit of dialogue, “Have some water.”

Q: If you won an award for this film who would you thank in your acceptance speech?

JL: Of course the cast, who really brought Will Reading to life, and then a long speech about my wife and my mom, who were constantly behind me even though they are not particularly interested in filmmaking – they were just there for me.

If you would like to watch Will Reading you can find it on Amazon Prime right now, with a wider release planned for the near future and as always I have a review of the film up on my site right now!

If you enjoyed this interview, then please head over to my Patreon to support me, I offer personalized shoutouts and the ability for you to tell me what to review next. Check it out!

https://www.patreon.com/AnotherMillennialReviewer

Will Reading: Helping Your Dead Friends Wife Cheat The IRS

Written by Luke Barnes

Will Reading is a comedy film directed by Jamie Insalaco. The plot sees a group of friends gather together after the death of one of their number, to help the deceased widow find money that her husband had hidden from the IRS.

I think there is something so earnest and pure about this film. It captures friendship in such a realistic and warm way, the friendships within this film feel genuine, it reminds you off those you are closest to and it feels like a warm security blanket.

I found the laughter from a sad origin idea to be quite ingenious, and I thought seeing this group come together to help out after the death of their friend only really added to the wholesome appeal of the film.

Though this film is not a laugh a minute, there are a good amount of laughs scattered throughout and many more moments to smile to.

Overall, a delightfully funny comedy with a winning personality and a wholesome appeal.

Pros

The wholesome appeal

The focus on friendship

A few good laughs

A lively pace

Cons.

Somewhat predictable

3.5/5

If you enjoyed this review, then please head to my Patreon to support me, I offer personalized shoutouts, the ability for you to tell me what to review next, and a film based Q and A. Check it out! https://www.patreon.com/creator-home

Falcon And The Winter Soldier: Power Broker

Written by Luke Barnes

Falcon and The Winter Soldier episode 3 Power Broker is the third episode in the Marvel Disney + series. The plot sees Sam (Anthony Mackie) and Bucky (Sebastian Stan), break Baron Zemo (Daniel Bruhl), out of prison so that he can help them find out more information about the super soldier program and the Flag Smashers.

I thought this episode was on the whole good, not as good as the previous episode however, for reasons we will get to later. I thought it moved the story along and introduced some interesting new elements and locations to the MCU that I hope to see again in other films and Disney + series.

It was nice to see Sharon Carter (Emily VanCamp) return. Though she did not do a lot, really she was just there to spout exposition and to remind the audience she was alive. However, she did manage to make an impression due to one very graphic, for the MCU, and well-choreographed fight scene.  

My issues with this episode are twofold. Firstly, I think the two separate storylines, the boys hunting down answers about the super soldier serum, and the stuff with the fake Captain America (Wyatt Russell) are starting to clash. Personally I think the stuff with the fake Captain America is going in a very obvious direction and I would rather they just get it over with so we can focus on the more interesting matters at hand.

Secondly, and this is linked to the previous point, the idea of Bucky and Sam going rogue and the Government coming for them for freeing Zemo feels very phase 3, very Civil War era and I get that it is a stylistic inspiration for the show, but personally I think the MCU is past it and I don’t really want to see it go back.

Overall, still a strong episode, but some of the tonal and plot issues are starting to show.

Pros.
Zemo

Bringing back Sharon

The ending

Cons.

They do use Sharon for anything interesting

The storylines are starting to clash

A bit too Civil War like for my taste

3/5

If you enjoyed this review, then please head to my Patreon to support me, I offer personalized shoutouts and the ability for you to tell me what to review next. Check it out!

https://www.patreon.com/AnotherMillennialReviewer

Interview With Phil Stubbs: Writer/ Director Of Last Chancers

Written by Luke Barnes

I recently had the chance to interview Phil Stubbs writer and director of Last Chancers, a film about two friends who run afoul of a local gangster and must find a way out of their situation. We chat about

Q: How would you describe the film, in a word?

PS: Friendship

Q: Who is your filmmaking inspiration?

PS: Peter Jackson

 Q: What was your catalyst for making this film?

PS: I just had to try making a feature film, despite having no experience.

Q: Any funny on-set stories?

PS: An unpleasant cafe owner was having an argument with Brian Croucher then recognised him from EastEnders.

Q: Gloucestershire plays a large role in the film, why was this setting so important to you and the film?

PS: I’ve always lived in Gloucestershire and always thought it would look good on film and be a different setting for this kind of story

 Q: What is your favourite British crime film, other than your own?

PS: The Long Good Friday

Q: How would you describe your experiences making this film?

PS: Very stressful. Learning how to get the work done while battling many onset problems

Q: How did you manage the comedy to crime ratio, and how important was the buddy dynamic between Flynn and Aiden?

PS: Keeping the tone consistent was important so I was very careful when writing the script. The friendship between Flynn and Aiden anchors the whole story so had to be believable and compelling for audiences to enjoy the film.

 Q: If you could go back in time to when you were first starting out as a filmmaker what advice would you give yourself?

PS: Don’t get so stressed, take more time to get the shots how you want them.

 Q:  If you won an award for this film who would you thank?

 The amazing cast, the crew, the editor Lucy, and my girlfriend Ali for putting up with me pursuing the crazy idea of being a filmmaker.

If you enjoyed this interview you can find Last Chancers on Amazon and as always I have an review of the film on site now.

If you enjoyed this review, then please head to my Patreon to support me, I offer personalized shoutouts, the ability for you to tell me what to review next, and a film based Q and A. Check it out!

https://www.patreon.com/creator-home

Last Chancers: Even The Countryside Is Rife With Gangsters

Written by Luke Barnes

Last Chancers is a British crime comedy film directed by Phil Stubbs. The plot sees two friend Flynn (Ellis J. Wells) and Aiden (Harry Dyer) become indebted to an old school nasty after a hapless mistake, together they must come up with a way out of their situation.

There is something of an early Guy Ritchie with this film, though obviously with more of a comedic leaning, it is a stylistic decision that greatly helps this film and allows it to feel snappy and sharp and more importantly slick.

Though the premise was nothing new, I though it was done well, and it served to be quite entertaining. The film wasn’t a laugh out loud, laugh a minute kind of film but it did have more than enough moments that made me chuckle or at least smile.

I think the film mainly gets its tone right, managing to mix dramatic tension with levity. The tone does skew to one extreme a few times at the expense of the other, which hurts the film, but does not happen often.

My main issue with this film is that I think it needs to be tighter. This is a good film, by and large however, it really suffers from bloat and quite a few scenes could do with being chopped down to better add to the flow.

Overall, despite a few structural problems there is a lot of promise to this film, and I would be excited to see what the filmmaker does next.

Pros.

The comedy, for the most part works

The premise is well executed

Moments of early Guy Ritchie

Cons.

Slight tonal issues

Pacing problems

4/5

If you enjoyed this review, then please head to my Patreon to support me, I offer personalized shoutouts, the ability for you to tell me what to review next, and a film based Q and A. Check it out!

https://www.patreon.com/creator-home

Interview With Tom Heard: Actor/ Filmmaker Getting It

Written by Luke Barnes

I recently had the chance to talk to actor/ filmmaker Tom Heard about his romantic film Getting It, which follows a selfish man as he opens himself up and finds love. We talk about, representation, love and Call Me By Your Name.  

Q: How would you describe the film in a word?

TH: Hope. (That people can change).

Q:  Who are your filmmaking inspirations?

TH: Well, Mike Nichols has always been my hero. And now Luca Guadagnino (Call Me By Your Name) is right up there.

 Q: What was your catalyst for making this film

TH: I wanted to make a love story about two gay men where being gay isn’t the story. Just two

people who fall in love who happen to be gay.

Q: Any funny on set stories?

TH: The campfire scene was shot on pastureland owned by a friend of mine where it had just poured rain and we had to dodge puddles and cow patties all night long!

Q: How would you describe the process of trying to get an LGBTQ+ romance film made?

TH:  I met no resistance at all. Only support. Everyone thought it was a great idea and loved the story!

Q: How do you feel about the current state of the romance genre?

TH: Well, because of films such as the aforementioned, “Call Me By Your Name,” as well as others like, “God’s Own Country,” I think we’re in a great place at present!

 Q: Would you say Hollywood is more progressive now than it has been in the past few years?

TH: I think Hollywood has jumped light years recently and has really embraced alternative storytelling.

Q: What was the message of your film? What did you want to say?

TH: That the most selfish thing anyone can do for themselves…is to be unselfish. In other words, the more you give of yourself, the more you will receive in return.

Q: If you were to go back in time to when you were a younger filmmaker first starting out what advice would you give yourself?

TH: The same thing I’d say to anyone. Believe in yourself. What have you got to lose?

Q: If you film ever won any awards who would you thank in your acceptance speech?

TH: My best friend, Michael. His constant encouragement gave me the confidence to embark on this journey.

Q: Future filmmaking plans?

TH:  I am currently writing, “Comeback” about two actors who give each other’s careers and lives new life!

If you enjoyed Getting It you can find it on all good streaming platforms and on DVD, and as always you can head over to my site to find my review of the film.

If you enjoyed this interview, then please head to my Patreon to support me, I offer personalized shoutouts and the ability for you to tell me what to review next. Check it out!

https://www.patreon.com/creator-home

Getting It: Modern Love

Written by Luke Barnes

Getting It is a romance film directed by Tom Heard. The plot sees a previously selfish man, who only ever cared about himself, opening his heart to others and finding love in the process.

I think there is something so needed about this film, I won’t go on at length about it as I have already covered the point I am about to make in other reviews, but there just aren’t enough romance films that feature solid LGBTQ+ representation. It is shocking to think that in 2021, in the society we live in, where all kinds of romances are common place, that the romantic genre is so heavily dominated by heterosexual romance.

Moreover, the romance in this film felt very real and personal. By that I mean, it doesn’t feel like you are watching a film it feels like you are just observing life around you and seeing people fall in love. Again, that speaks to the charisma and the believability of the leads who sell the romance entirely, and palpable their on screen chemistry.

This film really does run the emotional gambit, having moments to laugh with, moments to cheer to, and moments that will make you cry, it excels at all 3 which is a real testament to the power of the writing.

Overall, a sorely needed and well executed romance film.

Pros.

The chemistry

The believability of the story and the romance

The emotional resonance

The ending

Cons.

The side characters

A few pacing issues.

3/5

If you enjoyed this review, then please head to my Patreon to support me, I offer personalized shoutouts and the ability for you to tell me what to review next. Check it out!

https://www.patreon.com/AnotherMillennialReviewer

Happily: That Couples That Annoys You With How Perfect They Are, Aren’t So Perfect

Written by Luke Barnes

Happily is a dark comedy thriller film directed by BenDavid Grabinski. The film follows a perfect couple (Kerry Bishe and Joel McHale), who never argue, always agree and never cease to irritate those around them. However, one day a stranger (Stephen Root) arrives at their door to tell them that they are genetic abnormalities, and that he won’t leave until they take a syringe of fluid that will make them just like everyone else. Naturally they kill this man and then go on a staycation with their friends.

This was a bizarre film, and you only begin to understand and appreciate a lot of its subtler details if you watch it a few times as there is a lot going on. I think this is a bold stylistic piece with all kinds of visual influences on display, and a plot that defies genre categorisation; I gave it a try, but it is so much more.

That is not to say this film is perfect, as it isn’t, the ending didn’t ring true to me and felt like an anti-climax; especially after the emotionally charged scenes that lead up to it. Furthermore, the tone frequently clashes as the film struggles to find how to approach its narrative. There will be scenes with levity in them that really don’t need it, and then scenes that do need a line to lighten the mood go without; it is an odd mishmash a lot of the time. Tonally this film is a quagmire.
I thought the wider world of this film and its concepts were riveting and I would love to see a follow up film, or other films set within this same universe, to explore these ideas in further detail. The idea of this agent, or god like character, who can’t die and who works for a higher authority is very tantalising and is begging for further exploration.

Overall, a hell of a concept and an idea, sadly the execution is lacking. However, a follow up in this universe could fix a lot of this films ills.

Pros.

The concept

The world

The characters

Cons.

The inconsistent tone

The ending

3/5

If you enjoyed this review, then please head to my Patreon to support me, I offer personalized shoutouts and the ability for you to tell me what to review next. Check it out!

https://www.patreon.com/AnotherMillennialReviewer

Friday The 13th Part 5: Will Summers Ever Be Safe Again?

Written by Luke Barnes

Friday The 13th part 5 is a slasher horror film directed by Danny Steinmann. The plot continues the saga of Tommy Jarvis (John Shepard, now playing an older Tommy), who has been left scarred after the brutal end of Jason (Tom Morga), in the previous film and now lives in fear of the killer’s return from beyond the grave.

I will applaud this film for what it was trying to do, it was trying to exist without Jason; an errand that was always fated to fail as the series lives because of Jason, but that is also bold and interesting. I also thought the decision to focus on the after effects of a final showdown with Jason on Tommy was inspired.

However, ultimately I think this film is disappointing. Mainly because it squanders the chance for where this series could have gone without being reliant on Jason, by introducing a newer and blander version of basically the same character who has nothing noteworthy about him at all.

Moreover, other than Tommy, who benefited from having a previous, good, film to set him up, the rest of the cast of slasher fodder were all very forgettable as were the kills.

Overall, what began as a project of promise ended up being very generic.

Pros.

The mental health focus

The gutsy decision to try and move the series beyond Jason

Tommy Jarvis as a character

Cons.

It is dull

It is more than a little repetitive

It squanders its promise

2.5/5

If you enjoyed this review, then please head to my Patreon to support me, I offer personalized shoutouts and the ability for you to tell me what to review next. Check it out!

https://www.patreon.com/AnotherMillennialReviewer

Falcon And The Winter Solider: The Star-Spangled Man

Written by Luke Barnes

The Star-Spangled Man is the second episode of Marvel’s Falcon And The Winter Soldier. The episode revolves around the introduction of the new Captain America (played by Wyatt Russell), as well as further developments with the Flag Smashers, and an exploration of the ideas around the super soldier serum and it’s continuation beyond Steve Rogers (Chris Evans).

I was deeply disappointed with the first episode of TFTWS, but I have to say this episode was a lot better and really got the series going in the right direction.

First off I want to say how excellent the Isaiah Bradley (Carl Lumbly) twist was it showed us a whole otherside of the super soldier project, which helped us recontextualise it in our minds whilst also expanding the wider mythos of the MCU to an interesting new dimension.

Secondly, the series is greatly helped by now having Sam (Antony Mackie) and Bucky (Sebastian Stan) on screen together. After watching this episode it only becomes clearer to me that one of the biggest issues with the first episode of this series was keeping its two main men separated. Luckily this episode fixes that and brings them together. Mackie and Stan have terrific on-screen chemistry together and really make the show what it is, their easy banter and shared pains make you want to watch the show and give a damn about the characters.

Thirdly, I enjoyed how this episode showed us the new Captain America in a wider light, we get to see him as both a villain to Bucky and Sam (the former takes an immediate dislike to him), as well as a hero in his own right.  The ending of the episode teases us with bigger things to come and no doubt the new Captain America will have his character explored in further depth, but this is a nice start.

My only issue with this episode is that despite marking a quarter of the series being over, (as it is only 6 episodes), it still feels like it is arranging the pieces, which really should have been done in the first episode. An example of what I am talking about is that Sharon Carter (Emily VanCamp), was said to have a large role in the series yet now we are a quarter of the way through it, and she is yet to appear. The pace should either have been quicker or there should have been more episodes commissioned to better fit this slow style.

Overall, a much, much stronger episode, however pacing still remains an issue.

Pros.

Bringing Bucky and Sam together

The reveal of Isaiah Bradley

Zemo

The new Captain America and his character work

Cons.

The pace is still too slow

4/5

If you enjoyed this review, then please head over to my Patreon to support me, I offer personalized shoutouts, one on one Q and As and the ability for you to tell me what to review next. Check it out!

https://www.patreon.com/AnotherMillennialReviewer