Interview with Cody Clarke Writer/Director My Submission.

We recently interviewed Cody Clarke for their film My Submission about an actress’s attempts to land a job, and her night recording self tapes. We talked about found footage, the beast that is the industry at large, and the prospect of AI as a downsizing tool in Hollywood.

AMR: We get a lot of found footage films these days, mostly in horror, what made you want to do a comedy/drama film in that vein?

CC: I’ve made a couple other non-horror found footage movies (The DVD, We Should Make a Movie) as well as several mockumentaries, and I think a bunch of years ago it just got into my head that presenting fictional characters through a piece of art that the characters have ostensibly created themselves is a really interesting way to get to know them. Much as we might get to know (or feel like we’ve gotten to know) a real life filmmaker through their work, the same could be done with characters. Not all stories would work for being told in this way, but once I had that realization that it was a possibility, it opened the doors conceptually for me to be able to come up with those kinds of stories once in a while.

I’m forever in debt to horror as essentially starting the ‘found footage’ subgenre, but I think some subgenres that start within a certain genre have the potential to work in other genres as well, if we just expand our minds. For instance, psychological horror becoming psychological comedy or psychological drama in the hands of someone like Charlie Kaufman. But, that particular leap of course happened in literature long before it ever happened in film.

AMR: How much of your own experience/those close to you experiences, went into this film regarding trying to get projects and experiences within the film industry?

CC: I mean, people who know me will definitely see a lot of me in this movie, particularly in her character. Not necessarily personality-wise, but definitely opinion-wise in spots. A filmmaker friend of mine, Dan Lotz, said that this might be the most Cody Clarke movie that I’ve made yet. He might be right, and not just because of the soapbox aspects, but because it is kind of a synthesis of a lot of what I’m into aesthetically and intellectually.

As for my own experiences, all of my dealings with the Hollywood machine itself have been horrible, in kind of a ‘the house always wins’ way. It’s a casino, and you’re just a mark. Even if you’re a golden goose, even if you’re bursting with ideas and could make them a ton of money, you’re just a mark in their eyes. The one good thing is that you really do on occasion meet cool, not at all fake people who work within that system and who are beacons of light amidst the darkness. Famous people who are a lot cooler and more aware than you could even imagine, but just can’t be publicly cool, or else like whack-a-mole they’ll be whacked on the head for it and sent back into their hidey hole. To use the casino metaphor again, I guess it’s like meeting a waitress at a casino that you do genuinely connect with, but she can’t let the pit boss see her being a normal human being with a customer, so you’ve gotta be stealth about it.

AMR: Normally I’d put this in later but I think it works here, from this project what would your advise be to people trying to get into the industry who are doing similar things to your protagonist in parts of the film?

CC: That’s a great question. I think above all else my advice would be that, if you really are right for something, like destined for a particular project, there really isn’t a wrong note you can hit or a wrong thing you can do (other than you turning it down). You’re just ‘it’—it’s just fate at that point. Someone can see you across the room at a party, or in a department store, and get this psychic realization that you’re who they’ve been looking for for their art. The best projects come together like that, are romantic in that sense. I’d say just open yourself up to recognizing those moments in life when they happen, and not being afraid by those moments just because you got it into your head that you need to have recorded the perfect slate video, or paid for the perfect headshot, or put together the perfect reel, or read the lines in a perfect way. It doesn’t have to be hard work, is what I mean, and it’s not a red flag if something comes to you easily and effortlessly. The best opportunities in life often come as a result of someone just being irrationally, often inexplicably, enthusiastic about you. And that can seem creepy at first maybe, to the uninitiated, but at its core its the most beautiful thing in the universe, and a powerful way for art to come together. That said, genuine creeps can operate in that same way, but what they’re doing is an impression of that, not actually that. Just because they’re faking love at first sight doesn’t mean that love at first sight doesn’t exist.

AMR: How do you see A.I reshaping the experience of those seeking to work in the industry in the next few years?

CC: My first love was magic, and in learning magic you learn to spot magic tricks, and most of what I’ve seen as far as the promise of AI isn’t real, just a trick. Like, for example, the most impressive stuff people see from AI is very helped along and corrected by humans. It’s like 20% AI, 80% human tweaking of what was generated. AI is a technology, but it’s not THE technology, and it never will be. It over-promises and over-hypes in order to get a ton of funding, and then it under-delivers and blames that on not having enough money and resources and water and energy. Even though every available speck of that is being allocated to AI. The truth is, there is a ceiling to all this AI stuff, and it’s a lot lower than futurists say it is. Our world is going to be reshaped and contorted and upended in various other ways besides AI.

As far as navigating that in the immediate, people doing things BECAUSE of AI is a very real threat, even though AI itself is an overblown threat. A company laying off a ton of people because it thinks AI can do all their jobs easier and cheaper is a threat, even if it’s not literally true that AI will be able to do that. Belief in AI is more dangerous than AI. The belief is the danger, less so the tech.

I would say that Hollywood is very clearly being downsized, and AI is certainly an aspect of that, but AI is mostly just the scapegoat—the Hollywood model is dead for plenty of other reasons, it’s just that AI is a convenient reason to present to the public. The writing was on the wall for a while though. What makes a movie able to be a movie was chipped away at for decades, and now there’s almost nothing left to chip away. The Hollywood era is almost over. But, filmmakers like me and others will always make films, because we don’t do it to be a part of industry, we do it because we genuinely love the medium.

AMR: What was your inspiration behind making this film, this can be filmic inspiration or personal real life inspiration?

CC: I think I’ve made so many movies at this point that my biggest inspiration for my films are just previous films of mine. I’ll be working on a movie, and at some point I’ll think to myself ‘oh—if I were to zag here in the story instead of zig, I could have a completely different movie that tackles this similar theme’. And then I just write down that germ of an idea and revisit it later. Then, of course, when you start actually fleshing an idea out, it changes and changes and changes, and by the time you’re done with it, audiences might not see how intrinsically connected the two pieces of art by you are. But, they’ll feel a sort of distant-relative aspect to them perhaps.

AMR: If you had to sum up the message of the film in a line what would it be?

CC: What you hold dear when alone, for your own survival, will not be the same as what you hold dear when you’re in love and can finally breathe.

AMR: Do you have any future projects you would like to talk about or plug?

CC: I’m writing a sci-fi film right now that I’m really excited about, and that I have the lead cast for (someone new that I haven’t worked with before). I hope to shoot that in the Spring or Summer here in NYC. But, with how fast I work, who knows, I might shoot a couple other movies before then. I will certainly participate in Joel Haver’s yearly ‘Make a Movie Instead of Watching the Oscars’ event, where thousands of people around the world shoot a feature film (40 minutes or more, by the Academy’s own definition) in the 3 1/2 hours that the Oscars are airing, then edit it in a week. I’ve done that every year since 2022. But, the sci-fi one is my next real big project.

If you would like to check out My Submission yourself you can head over to the link below

http://killthelionfilms.gumroad.com/

If you enjoyed this interview , then please head over to my Patreon to support me. All film reviews are free, with no early access, sponsorships, or content locked behind paywalls. If you value independent coverage of the entertainment industry, your support over there helps to keep it going. Become a member on Patreon below

patreon.com/AnotherMillennialReviewer

Or if you would rather send me a donation if Patreon isn’t for you then please find a link to my Ko-Fi donation page below

http://ko-fi.com/anothermillennialreviewer

My Submission: The Quest For Fame

Summary: A young woman spends her evening sending out self tapes in the hopes of getting work in the industry.

In many senses this is an industry film, that is not to say you wouldn’t like it if you don’t have industry experience, but it is to say that you would gleam more from it by having been part of the machine. The relatability of the protagonist her struggle, her wanting to be part of it, her persistence all rings more true if you have experienced it yourself.

I thought the film was one of the rare sort of films that work as a comedy and as a drama, as there were moments of comedy that land in a real human way, but also the struggles and the self doubt come across as earnest. It would have been very easy for these struggles to just feel generic or cookie cutter but there is enough personalisation to it that it comes across as genuine and again relatable.

Relatable is the key word I would use to describe this film above all others.

I think the found footage style helped add a little flair of the different to this film and helped set it apart as a framing device and that it was used to great effect. I would say there are a couple of moments where the use of found footage  is slightly limiting in terms of storytelling, but that is a formatting trade off ultimately.

Overall, a painfully earnest film that also has some sparkling comedic moments.

4/5

The earnest elements

The found footage angle

The comedy

The relatability

Cons.

Slightly format constraints

If you enjoyed this review , then please head over to my Patreon to support me. All film reviews are free, with no early access, sponsorships, or content locked behind paywalls. If you value independent coverage of the entertainment industry, your support over there helps to keep it going. Become a member on Patreon below

patreon.com/AnotherMillennialReviewer

Or if you would rather send me a donation if Patreon isn’t for you then please find a link to my Ko-Fi donation page below

http://ko-fi.com/anothermillennialreviewer

Iron Lung: 1000 Leagues Under The Blood Sea.

Summary:  A YouTuber is the galaxies last hope, that feels about right for 2026.

So, I went into this having not played the game before, I didn’t think the film did a great job of explaining the world or the mythology and that is my main issue with it. The cosmic horror we got was interesting, the under sea devil/creature, but it was too vague and under explained.

I understand if you want to faithfully adapt the game and the game is ambiguous then you don’t want to change things but I think changing the medium you do need to assume audiences won’t have the same sort of thought patterns.

There were some pacing issues towards the back half of the film and a lot of the stuff revolving around the character’s past were again underdeveloped. Really the issue was that due to the backstory stuff being so underdeveloped when the film went back to that you were groaning and bored.

Overall, a watchable horror film with some interesting concepts but the script needed a hell of a lot more work.

2.5/5

Pros.

Good concept

Interesting world

Watchable

Cons.

The world building is poor

There are pacing issues

Some of the camera work was a bit clunky

If you enjoyed this Cinema Issues article , then please head over to my Patreon to support me. All film reviews are free, with no early access, sponsorships, or content locked behind paywalls. If you value independent coverage of the entertainment industry, your support over there helps to keep it going. Become a member on Patreon below

patreon.com/AnotherMillennialReviewer

Or if you would rather send me a donation if Patreon isn’t for you then please find a link to my Ko-Fi donation page below

http://ko-fi.com/anothermillennialreviewer

Hamnet: Upstart Crow Did It First.

Summary: the death of Shakespeare’s son.

Whilst the title implies that Upstart Crow, a British TV show did it first, I would argue that where the difference comes is in the framing. Within Upstart Crow the focus is very much on Shakespeare’s point of view this is more so from the point of view of his wife Agnes/Anne.

This is Jessie Buckley’s film, she should win best actress for it, her performance is likely a career high, though the Bride is coming soon. Her performance is not only the emotional core of the film but also the life force for everything else that happens.

The subject matter is handled in a way that is depressing yes, a child dies, but you would argue that there is a more optimistic feeling by the end of the film. If you cannot handle depictions of grief or child mortality this might not be the film for you as it goes go to some dark places.

I appreciated the hyper real aspects to the film such as the stuff with the cave and the hawk and think that it provided a nice respite from being too depressing.

Overall, a strong emotional film.

4/5

Pros.

The performances

The emotion

The ending

The impact

Cons.

Pacing issues

If you enjoyed this Cinema Issues article , then please head over to my Patreon to support me. All film reviews are free, with no early access, sponsorships, or content locked behind paywalls. If you value independent coverage of the entertainment industry, your support over there helps to keep it going. Become a member on Patreon below

patreon.com/AnotherMillennialReviewer

Or if you would rather send me a donation if Patreon isn’t for you then please find a link to my Ko-Fi donation page below

http://ko-fi.com/anothermillennialreviewer

Cinema Issues: Bob Iger The Man Who Killed Disney

In this edition of cinema issues we are talking about Bob Iger, the CEO of Disney.

So for many Bob was THE Disney CEO he brought in Marvel and Star Wars and led Disney to many successes under his regime. A lot of the misses such as Disney + we blamed on Bob Chapek during his short tenure before Bob returned.

However as the man looks set to leave at the end of the year let’s look over how he leaves Disney as a company, it’s not good.

Lucasfilm has collapsed. Lucasfilm has not released a Star Wars film in 7 years, the last Indiana Jones film flopped. Star Wars this thing that Disney spent billions on has become a TV brand and even in the realm of streaming it is struggling to bring in big numbers. The Mandalorian and Grogu is on the horizon but the likelihood of that making past 700 million is unlikely as the Star Wars fandom is just too divided, due to executives who operated under Bob.

Marvel is trying to right the ship to not end up like Lucasfilm. However, in the last year all 3 films Marvel released at the cinema flopped and the Disney + offerings are not doing big numbers. Since Endgame back in 2019 Marvel has been in decline and has been haemorrhaging viewers and engagement. Whilst some of the terrible glut of phase 4 and phase 5 can be blamed on Chapek demanding content at all costs, Iger could have cancelled and scrapped projects when he came back but he didn’t. He allowed the brand harm.

Pixar is still capable of making money with films like Inside Out 2 but scattered around that are films like Lightyear and Elio. Films that flopped terribly and that show that Pixar is not the titan it used to be. Whilst Chapek did harm the brand by letting a lot of Pixar’s films go straight to streaming teaching audiences to stay home, Iger did not do enough to manage quality since his return.

Disney animation has not been able to get out Frozen 3 despite it being a guaranteed billion dollar film, with Frozen 2 coming out 7 years ago.

The live action remark strategy has been mixed with some hits and some misses and that is probably Iger’s shining light of his second tenure.

Crucially Iger has been the message CEO he has been the one to see Disney lean into DEI, Bob Chapek again gets a lot of criticism for this but it all started under Bob. He has since said things such as they are going to focus on storytelling over message yet this is not reflected in filmmaking output. What has been required is a much stronger hand at the executive level over production. As you can see from this article Iger hasn’t been that strong hand he has been a CEO representing managed decline of a brand.

If you enjoyed this Cinema Issues article , then please head over to my Patreon to support me. All film reviews are free, with no early access, sponsorships, or content locked behind paywalls. If you value independent coverage of the entertainment industry, your support over there helps to keep it going. Become a member on Patreon below

patreon.com/AnotherMillennialReviewer

Or if you would rather send me a donation if Patreon isn’t for you then please find a link to my Ko-Fi donation page below

http://ko-fi.com/anothermillennialreviewer

Starfleet Academy: Episodes 3+4

Summary: the cringe intensifies.

So, I didn’t intend to cover these, I was going to walk away from the show after the first two episodes, but due to people writing in to the site to ask me to cover the latest two episodes, here we are.

For a lot of these episodes very little of substance happens, lots of crying, lots of emotions lots of roll your eyes scenes but not much of substance. We do get a look into Klingon culture where we are told that one character played by a black actor has two dads that both abandoned him. This feels like they are deliberately trying to play into the deeply racist stereotypes of black children being abandoned by their fathers. At times much like with Iron Heart last year it feels like the progressives who make these shows are actually more racist than anyone else.

The one thing I couldn’t ignore as I watched the two recent episodes was just how this show feels like parody. It feels like it was written to spoof other seasons of Star Trek, yet whilst something like the Orville did that well here it just feels lazy and cheap.

The characters are also black holes of charisma.

Overall, it is not worse than the first two episodes it is more of the same.

1/5

Pros

It’s unintentionally funny

Cons.

It feels racist

It’s a bad parody

The characters are awful

It is cringe

If you enjoyed this Cinema Issues article , then please head over to my Patreon to support me. All film reviews are free, with no early access, sponsorships, or content locked behind paywalls. If you value independent coverage of the entertainment industry, your support over there helps to keep it going. Become a member on Patreon below

patreon.com/AnotherMillennialReviewer

Or if you would rather send me a donation if Patreon isn’t for you then please find a link to my Ko-Fi donation page below

http://ko-fi.com/anothermillennialreviewer

Hurry Up Tomorrow: Keep Musicians Out Of The Film Industry

Summary: this will be brief, there isn’t much to say about this film beyond it’s a vanity project that shows that Jenna Ortega needs to pick better scripts.

It is the sort of horror film you have seen many times before trying to appear to be some mix of traditional genre fare, and social horror when it is neither. The film thinks it is a lot more clever than it is.

The Weekend can’t act and increasingly his involvement with a project is shorthand for it being awful, even if he isn’t starring in it. This film also raises the grim spector of can Jenna Ortega even act? Increasingly it seems she can play one sort of role, but Aubrey Plaza was already playing that so we don’t need anyone else.

As someone who watches a lot of horror this one was clear from the trailer what sort of film it was going to be.

Overall, the Weekend needs to stick to music.

0.5/5

Pros.

It is short

Cons,

It’s cringe

It thinks it is more than it is

Jenna Ortega

The Weekend

It is awfully paced

If you enjoyed this Cinema Issues article , then please head over to my Patreon to support me. All film reviews are free, with no early access, sponsorships, or content locked behind paywalls. If you value independent coverage of the entertainment industry, your support over there helps to keep it going. Become a member on Patreon below

patreon.com/AnotherMillennialReviewer

Or if you would rather send me a donation if Patreon isn’t for you then please find a link to my Ko-Fi donation page below

http://ko-fi.com/anothermillennialreviewer

Cinema Issues: The Public Death Of The Movie Star.

In this edition of Cinema Issues we will be talking about the death of movie stars.

Now I don’t mean literally, I mean in terms of career suicide. The basic premise going into this is the following as a movie star you need as many people as possible to turn up to your films, splitting the audience down political lines is stupid.

Celebrities don’t seem to realise that by making nearly everything political they alienate themselves from the audience. For example why did Florence Pugh the British Actress need to have a little rant about I.C.E, she didn’t she’s not even American and yet she did it to virtue signal. That’s all it’s ever been, it’s showing allegiance to whatever cause their agent tells them to.

Increasingly, studios need to crack down on this, actors need to be told to shut up whilst promoting a film and that if they run their mouth about hot button issues it will cost them work. There is a reason stars of old generally kept their mouths shut about this kind of thing, they aren’t politicians, they aren’t unionists, they aren’t even political agents, they are actors their job is to entertain the public and that is it.

Seeing Natalie Portman or Jenna Ortega run her mouth about politics just means more and more people aren’t going to show up for their next project. In an era where people don’t go to the cinema much anymore this is not helping matters.

Melania: The Final Verdict

Summary: Jeff over at Amazon did this to gain some favour with Donny Boy.

So, before we get into the film that has triggered so much outrage as believe me it will happen soon. I just wanted to say that this isn’t the first time a media company has made a film about a president or president’s family, there were many similar projects about the Obama’s so let’s not go down that road.

That said was this film needed? Did I waste my time? The answer is a hard no and maybe. In many ways this just feels like low rent reality TV, the sort you would expect of Trump and his family. Again is it awful not really it’s just brain-rot. There isn’t much ranting and raving about political matters, if anything it is trying to steer away from that altogether.

As you watch it you realise the film thinks it has a lot to say or that it has some deeper meaning but really it’s just a bored housewife trying to fill her days and in many senses that’s a universal concept.

It is neither shockingly bad nor shockingly good, it just kills an amount of time in your day and if that’s something you want then I guess you can watch it but otherwise maybe give it a miss

Overall, a waste of time.

2/5

Pros.

It is passive viewing

It is short

Cons.

It is boring

It isn’t deep

It didn’t need to be made

If you enjoyed this Cinema Issues article , then please head over to my Patreon to support me. All film reviews are free, with no early access, sponsorships, or content locked behind paywalls. If you value independent coverage of the entertainment industry, your support over there helps to keep it going. Become a member on Patreon below

patreon.com/AnotherMillennialReviewer

Or if you would rather send me a donation if Patreon isn’t for you then please find a link to my Ko-Fi donation page below

http://ko-fi.com/anothermillennialreviewer

Cinema Issues: The Death Of The Wicked Franchise

In this edition of cinema issues we are talking about the Wicked Franchise.

So after the crash out of many Wicked fans over the fact that the Oscars don’t hand out awards to the happiest film, or for fun and don’t exist to soothe them during “difficult times” in their privileged lives, we are talking about how this franchise fell from grace.

The first film did well at the box office , not billion dollar well but well and that set an unhealthy precedent. A lot of these musical theatre types thought that it was their moment and rallied behind the film thinking that due to it doing well at the box office it would win awards, then it didn’t.

They consoled themselves by saying well okay they are just holding off for the second film and then it’ll get all the awards. Things changed when the second film came out, the hype was smaller people had moved away, it made far less than the first film, and it was simply a worse film overall. As such it didn’t get nominated. The Academy doesn’t care about box office gross particularly, they care about good films.

You see when the second film came out there were conversations coming out from Universal about Wicked as a universe and new stories within it. I would argue these were premature as the box office for the second film highlighted diminishing returns. I don’t think a third Wicked film or a Wicked spin off would have anywhere near the audience of the first or even second film. I think that the musical theatre folks need to take the L on this one and move on.

Id argue that the Wicked Franchise is probably done and there shouldn’t be anymore films as if they stop here they can still go out calling it a success if they keep going that will get harder and harder to do.

If you enjoyed this Cinema Issues article , then please head over to my Patreon to support me. All film reviews are free, with no early access, sponsorships, or content locked behind paywalls. If you value independent coverage of the entertainment industry, your support over there helps to keep it going. Become a member on Patreon below

patreon.com/AnotherMillennialReviewer

Or if you would rather send me a donation if Patreon isn’t for you then please find a link to my Ko-Fi donation page below

http://ko-fi.com/anothermillennialreviewer