Fun Moms Dinner: The Fun Part Is Dead On Arrival

Reviewed by Luke Barnes

Fun Moms Dinner is a comedy film directed by Alethea Jones; the plot sees a group of pre-school mums go on a night out together that quickly gets out of hand.

You have seen this film before, let’s get that out of the way now- there is nothing new or fresh with this film at all. It feels like a retread of a lot of the jokes and ideas from the Bad Moms films, though those films were better in almost every way.

I am not saying this film is bad, not quite, it is watchable but not much more than that. Adam Scott shines as an out of his depth dad and has some nice scenes that are very cutesy. Out of the four titular mums, none really shine. If I was forced to pick one to single out for praise it would probably be Toni Collette who even still is not at her best here.

This feels very much like a for the paycheck kind of film.

The humour, rather unsurprisingly didn’t work for me, again comedy is subjective, but personally I didn’t find a single joke funny, at best the ‘jokes’ are unfunny and at worst they are incredibly cringey and just awful

Overall, a very middling film, watchable, but not funny

Pros

Adam Scott

It is watchable

Cons.

It feels like it was done for the money by a lot of the cast

It is not funny

The jokes are bad cringe

1/5

Football Factory: Hooligans In The UK

Football Factory is a British sports drama film directed by Nick Love. The plot examines the rise in football hooliganism, examining the lives of those who live to fight. We follow Tommy Johnson (Danny Dyer), one such hooligan as he gets caught up in a feud between two sects of fans and is forced to revaluate his life.

I don’t know if I have mentioned this in my reviews before, but I am a huge Danny Dyer fan and have been for a while: Dog House, The Business, Severance, Human Traffic all classic Dyer fare, and this fits in amongst that pantheon, though it doesn’t have as much charm as some of the others and is definitely rougher around the edges.

It is kind of crazy how badly this film wants to be Trainspotting, there are multiple moments in this film that feel almost shot for shot the same, with slight tweaks to avoid being called out. The difference of course is one is a British classic and the other is a blatant rip-off; I’ll let you figure out which is which.

Danny Dyer has his usual laddish charm and is okay here, though this does feel very safe for him. I would dare say that Dyer is upstaged by Neil Maskell, who plays his on-screen best friend and who also has some of the best scenes in the film, managing to inject a bit more soul into the film than Dyer seems capable off.

There are several moments in this film that are clearly supposed to be funny or sad, but in both cases the film struggles to achieve either. The first death doesn’t feel hugely impactful as we don’t really know the character, and the final death doesn’t bare weight as the film has done little to make us care about the character. The humour is far weaker, and the film tries less hard at this aim; those who the film is based on might find it funny, but anyone outside of that small group would probably be hard pushed to find a laugh here.

Overall, it is passable Dyer content, no The Business, in fact don’t watch this film at and just check out The Business it is a much better.

Pros.

Dyer and his roughish ways

Neil Maskell is trying

Cons.

The characters aren’t likeable and that limits the films emotional impact

The humour doesn’t work

It drags in parts

2/5

Reviewed by Luke

Interview With Craig Everett Earl Writer/Producer Of Intrusion: Disconnected

I recently had the chance to interview Craig Everett Earl, the writer and producer of horror film Intrusion: Disconnected, you can find a review of the film on site now, we chatted about everything from the state of modern horror, the trials and tribulations of filmmaking and of course the topic every interview needs, ICarly. Enjoy.

Q:  Important is creating and maintaining a running sense of tension to you in your films?

A:  I used to think that it wasn’t that important. Back when I wrote and produced the first Intrusion, I really didn’t want to concentrate on that. I just wanted to make a good story and characters people cared about. There is a big audience that considers a movie not being scary if they haven’t jumped, but basically the jump scare films are typically a loud cue in the music, the camera switching from a wide shot to close up and back to a wide suddenly with that loud cue. I’ve always thought realism in horror films was more scary because it’s unnerving when it’s something you can relate to or hear about in the paper the next morning. However, I gotta say tension and suspense definitely enhances the experience. With Intrusion: Disconnected, I tried to throw in a couple of jump scares but tried to focus more on the characters and try to get people relating to them. I think connecting to those characters and not wanting them to die is scarier in a sense and creates tension all on its own. The acting and the score for a film really enhances that tension and then in post you can always throw in the jump scare stuff for fun.

Q: Do you have any goof on set stories?

A: We have this running joke on set. One of my cinematographers brought up iCarly to get a point across for some reason. I honestly don’t even remember why. Somehow though, it turned into this ridiculous and meaningless joke. A couple of the cast started bringing up and blaming iCarly for everything whenever we had an issue. At one point, I believe one of my crew snuck a movie into the shot that actually said iCarly on it as a reminder. We had a blast running the gag into the ground. People would drop it and then someone would bring it up again to keep it going and everyone would sigh and laugh.

Q: Who is your inspiration artistically?

A: I was actually inspired by A Nightmare on Elm Street at age seven. I’m really disappointed I never got to meet Wes Craven, but I remember wanting to watch it and my mom telling my dad that I better not have nightmares. I wasn’t intrigued with the gore and killing, but the practical effects and I really loved the character-driven nature of it. Nancy Thompson was this character you were rooting for in every scene and one of the reasons I love horror. I also remember my parents having friends over later and telling me to go play with their kid. The first thing I showed them was A Nightmare on Elm Street and I think it terrified them. My parents said it was fine if it didn’t scare me but stop showing it to other kids. I’ve since met Robert England and Heather Langenkamp and they’re terrific people. John Saxon read the script and loved it but couldn’t sign on due to some SAG conflicts. Besides that though, I actually turned hugely to Poltergeist when I wrote Intrusion: Disconnected. I love how you think the film is over and there’s an entire thirty-minutes of chaos. I looked to that film when writing the script. I didn’t want anyone to know how or when it would end. I’ve seen so many horror films, so I really tried to make the audience think they knew where it was going and do the opposite.

Q: How would you describe the production in a word?

A: Exhausting. As a producer it definitely takes a toll on you both financially and emotionally. It’s very stressful and even if you’re prepared for things like the weather, sick actors, props not working properly, locations falling through at the last second, or even blocking and lighting a scene; it’s all something you have to be prepared to make quick, last second decisions to fix. I’ve lost thousands on a couple of days because of things that are beyond anyone’s control. Also, people on websites are so quick to condemn a film just after seeing a trailer, or the first five minutes. Someone writes the script, but then you have it go into production and the studio or director might decide to change scenes or things could get cut in the editing room. You hope you have good actors, audio, lighting, sound, the right score and a good editor. Any of these things could completely ruin a film. We had a lot of issues on the first Intrusion and it was basically like film school and a learning experience. So much got changed it took me six months to decide if I even liked it. After finally having our first screening and huge applause I calmed down a bit and enjoyed the film, despite the flaws. For Intrusion: Disconnected, I got about ninety-five percent of what I wanted and my director, Kyle Cates, and I was on the same page most of the time. That and having the tremendous cast and crew I did.

Q:  If you could go back in time to when you were an early filmmaker just starting out what advice would you give yourself?

A: Even if you’re just starting out and prepping to make a project start marketing yourself and growing a fan base. I’m still kicking myself for that to this day because I hate spending hours on social media and promoting constantly but that’s a big part of it. When I first started out I couldn’t get anyone to look at anything or give me the time of day. I had written a couple short stories and a novel and wasn’t really getting anywhere with them. I wrote Intrusion and went and got a loan. I ended up having to get two loans before I was able to shoot it. I hired a crew, found a cast and years later we’re getting rave reviews on this one and I’ve now written two features, produced three and worked on other projects, including one for Brad Pitt. Everything is a learning experience and networking. Once you start bumping into the same people at festivals they start to see your persistence and drive. That’s when they eventually want to work with you. People don’t become successful overnight and if you’ve actually made something that is a success, who if not everyone loves it. Somebody will always hate it. Making a film is without a doubt the hardest thing I’ve ever done. I completely respect everyone’s opinions, but most of the time when I see the really crude comments, I’m actually thinking they should go try to make a film themselves. It’s harder than they think. Even if I don’t like a film, my hat is off to those people for finishing it.

Q: What is more important to you as a filmmaker an overall atmosphere, or a series of individualized moments?

A: I basically treat my scripts like book chapters. I typically start by having an opening and know how the film is going to end. I think an ending is the most important part and with a lot of films I really feel let-down by the third act and the ending. I also think it’s hard to get it just right. I think atmosphere is extremely important as well, but a lot of films have great atmospheres and not enough intrigue to keep the story interesting. I also think there are times where you’re pushing for time on set with budget restraints and not everything works out. Some of that can be fixed and made into a better atmosphere during the editing process by leaving stuff on the cutting room floor and a great score to raise the tension. Sometimes, the best things happen during editing just experimenting and trying different things. I owe a lot of the atmosphere in this one to performances and the score that David Obaniyi composed. I thought he did an amazing job.

Q:  When having a killer or villain who is a constant threat, how do you think is the best way to communicate that to the audience?

 A: With the first Intrusion I really went for the normal guy next door. I originally was thinking about big and intimidating, but that’s been done to death. My wife and a friend actually said how serial killers don’t look like horror villains. They’re tall, skinny and look like the guy next door. I thought that was a lot more interesting to show this realistic version of a man and how he becomes a killer. With the sequel, it’s all about that grey line between good and evil. You have a heroine, Holly Jensen, played by Katie Stewart who is suffering from PTSD and mentally broken from the beginning of the film and the killer, Raymond Hummel, played by Lee Haycraft, now realizing his true nature and having this God-like complex. He’s much more calculated and manipulative in his actions. I think it’s scary that given the right circumstances something can send someone into madness and down that dark path. I wanted to tap into that more, along with some similarities between Holly and Raymond as people. In the original Intrusion, Raymond found out his girlfriend was cheating on him and killed her. Holly comes home and thinks that her boyfriend Peter is cheating for a moment. I did that on purpose. They’re both people with the circumstances they’re dealing with. The question is when given that hand, which path does the person take. I think that’s a lot more disturbing, the films that stick with you afterward and keep you thinking about things that make you uncomfortable. We all have this dark side. Most of us choose to be good people. The people that do not are definitely a threat.

Q: Future plans and sequel ideas?

A: Right now I’m actually in the process of revitalizing the book that I wrote years ago. It’s this love story that actually starts with tragedy in a small town with four characters surrounded by a lot of different dark issues in their lives. Not sure if it’s going to be a re-release since I own the rights again, or a possible film, but it’s something I’ll eventually put out there. I would love to do more projects with my cast and crew. They’re all extremely talented, but that’s going to depend on the success of Intrusion: Disconnected. I spent 25K on the first Intrusion and 80K on this one. I can’t do that again. If I get financing or funding for it I would love to keep doing this. I would love to do a creature-feature with Katie and Lee. Could be a lot of fun, but I love the drama genre. I definitely want to do something in that realm before going back into horror again. I have no plans to do a third Intrusion film but if a studio wanted to more with that world, I have a pitch for a T.V. Show that could be fun, but I doubt that will happen. I only did a sequel to Intrusion because we used it as a springboard for a more interesting, fresh idea. I think that’s the problem with sequels. If they’re made, they need some time to breathe and a better idea.

Q: How would you describe the state of modern horror?

A: I think the state of modern horror is great. It’s definitely thriving again both in a nostalgic way and with a lot of original films. A few years ago slashers started to disappear, and it was leaning more toward found footage and then a lot of paranormal films. Now, you seem to pretty much have your pick, and slashers are definitely on the rise again. Some people hate combining comedy with horror, but I think we have enough films coming out it’s great that everyone is trying to do something fresh with them. I just recently saw Spontaneous and thought it was brilliant. It was a love story about kids suddenly exploding, mixed with sci-fi, drama, horror and comedy and it worked perfectly. I think balancing different genres can be tricky and don’t always work, but I also think that it’s great people could make something and put any spin on it they want.

Q: If you ever won an Oscar who would you thank in your acceptance speech?

A: I would definitely thank my cast and crew. Without them, especially with this film, it wouldn’t have been possible. A couple of them went out of their way to make sure this was a reality. More than anyone though, I would thank my wife. I try hard not to bring my stress home with me when making a film, but that’s nearly impossible. She has been there from the beginning with me and picked me up a few times. I’ve also put her through Hell sometimes and things I still have a hard time forgiving myself for. We talked about having kids years ago and I put my career first and she gave up a lot of her dreams to let me achieve this and to let people see this. I had one day when I was on set out of state and she lost her mom. I had just seen her mom and they gave her about six months to live. My wife supported me to shoot the film because we were already prepped for it and everyone had cleared their schedules. During the shoot, got the phone call that she was going to pass away early after only weeks after we found out. I focused and was able to get through the shoot, but we took a break after that because I wasn’t there emotionally and even though my wife didn’t blame me it’s something I really hate myself for. I know her mom was asking for me minutes before she passed. That alone is heart-breaking and one of the many sacrifices I’ve made for people to be able to see this. Even when you achieve success it’s never this perfect way you imagine it. It comes with demons.

I hope you have enjoyed this interview, be sure to check out Intrusion: Disconnected now on Amazon Video and be sure to join me again for other interviews, features and reviews.

Luke  

Sacrifice: The Truth About The American Tourist

Sacrifice is a horror film directed by Andy Collier and Toor Mian. The plot sees Issac (Ludovic Hughes), and his pregnant girlfriend Emma (Sophie Stevens), venture to a remote Norwegian island to collect an inheritance after Issacs’s Mum dies. However, once they get there they start to realise that there is something sinister afoot.

I will give this film props for two things. Firstly, it perfectly captures everything wrong with the American tourist, assuming everyone who is not from the USA doesn’t speak English and then talking slower and louder to them, whilst also thinking that non-American customs are freaky and are something to be feared. It is funny to see an American film tell it like it is, in some cases, rather than try and pretend they aren’t like that.

The second thing I will commend this film for is Barbara Crampton. She is the standout performer here, though that isn’t hard, and completely excels as the town sheriff/ cult leader. She has moments of threat and menace and also moments when you warm to her slightly.

However, other than Crampton and honesty, this film has little else going for it and is bad. The film is painfully dull, and a lot of the runtime is devoted to just watching the main couple argue, and it goes on and on. When we aren’t being subjected to needlessly petty domestic squabbles, we are treated to a forced elder gods Lovecraft rip off storyline that feels like it comes out of nowhere and then ends abruptly.

Overall, don’t waste your time, let me waste my time for you. This film is poor, the same exact idea has been done before and has been done far, far better.

Pros.

The truth about the American tourist

Barbara Crampton

Cons.

It is dull

It is just a couple arguing for most of the runtime

The elder gods/ monster stuff just comes out of nowhere and is no way developed

It is not scary in anyway

1/5

Reviewed by Luke     

Noah: Riding The Wave

Noah is an epic biblical drama film directed by Darren Aronofsky. The plot serves as a retelling of the Bible story of Noah, but this time there are Earth Elementals and Noah (Russell Crowe), is kind of a dick.

This was a pleasant surprise, when I put this on I was expecting it to be a stuffy bible epic; Aronofsky’s name being attached was the only thing that got me to check it out. However, it is actually the furtherst thing from a stuffy bible film and goes out of its way to deviate itself from previous versions of the Noah story.

I enjoyed the harsh world of this film, the crime, the clans, the random miracles and what can only be described as magic. Honestly I would love to see a prequel centring around Anthony Hopkins Methuselah and his fire sword and the wars he fought to protect then Angles/ Elementals.

I think the performances were all strong, though some were stronger than others. Russell Crowe, the previously mentioned Hopkins, and Ray Winstone were all top tier, and each had multiple moments to standout. The rest of the cast were fine, but they were out-shined.

I also enjoyed the horror elements in this film, I think that the visions of water and fire and the one where Noah sees that demon are all very well shot, and although they are compact they leave quite an impact and actually feel scary and tense.

Overall, one of the best Bible epics I have ever seen by virtue of it really not being one.

Pros.

Deviating from all other Noah Stories

Hopkins, Crowe and Winstone

The horror

The family tension on the ark

Cons.

It is a bit too long; it could have been better paced

4/5

Reviewed by Luke

The Intern: Recasting Mary Poppins As Robert De Niro

The Intern is a buddy comedy film directed by Nancy Myers. The film sees widower Ben (Robert De Niro), decide to take up an internship for an online retailor after growing bored with his retirement. The rather obvious joke being, he’s an old man intern.

Believe me, I am thinking the same thing as you, I went into this one with incredibly low expectations; to be blunt I just wanted something mindless that I could passively watch whilst doing other things. However, this film soon captured my attention and was genuinely, surprisingly good.

I enjoyed how basically this film takes the idea of Mary Poppins and is like you know what I’d rather see that role played by Robert De Niro, and by God it works. This film is basically Nanny McPhee or Mary Poppins, De Niro’s character fixes the lives of everyone around him, sometimes in laughably implausible ways, whilst also being a font for sagely wisdom.

This film actually made me laugh out loud quite a few times, I really needed it so it was much appreciated, as I often say comedy is subjective so what worked for me might not work for you, but the sheer wholesome appeal of this film is tough to rival. De Niro and Anne Hathaway (who plays the co-lead), are both excellent and bounce off each other with fantastic vigour and chemistry.

Overall, a surprisingly great film.

Pros.

The jokes

The wholesomeness

De Niro

Hathaway

The idea of replacing Mary Poppins with an old man

Cons.

None

5/5

Reviewed by Luke     

Interview With James Watts (Death Trip)

Hey guys, just a bit of a lead in before the main event. This is my first interview and my first foray into that side of being a film reviewer! I recently had the chance to ask the director of Death Trip James Watts a few questions, about filmmaking, horror, and what it means to make a slasher film in the 2020s. Here is the interview verbatim.

Q: Who is your biggest inspiration?

 A: The films I am the biggest fan of have all managed to incorporate comedy (in one way or another) into their respective genres. Mary Harron’s American Psycho is a perfect example of this. There is nothing funnier to me than the scene in that movie where Patrick Bateman has peak-level stress over Paul Allen’s business cards. 

Alfred Hitchcock is obviously the best at this but so are the Coen Brothers, Robert Altman and Lina Wertmüller. 

And of course, the argument I always get into with friends is whether or not all of Stanley Kubrick’s movies are secretly comedies (I think that they are).

Q: What is your earliest memory of the horror genre?

A: Like a lot of people my age, my first experience with the horror genre was seeing excerpts from The Shining in the background during a memorable scene in the “Helen Hunt banger” Twister.

Bill Paxton is hightailing it to the weather van, the tornado is in full effect, but all I could focus on was the psycho with the axe being projected on the drive-in screen in the background. 

I was scared to watch The Shining for years because of that movie.

Q: How would you define the modern slasher film?

A: I feel like the slasher genre will always be modern. As far as I’m concerned, as long as there are a group of victims, a mysterious stalker and violence – anything goes. It’s really all about what the filmmakers do with those elements. 

Vera Dika has a good book about 70s and 80s slashers called Games of Terror and in it, she describes the appeal of the slasher movie: “catharsis”, “recreation” and “displacement”. That statement was about the 80s specifically, but modern slasher films are still appealing to audiences for these same reasons…and critics still hate them.

Q: Do you have any funny on-set stories?

A: Garrett jumped in the lake.

A freezing cold lake. 

We drilled a hole in it and he got in. In the movie, there’s never a clear angle of this actually happening, but I want it to be on record that Garrett Johnson went into a frozen lake, of his own volition, for the sake of this dumb movie.

Q: What was the message behind this film? And What does that message mean to you?

A: I’m going to repeat verbatim what my co-writer, Kelly Kay Hurcomb says (and she’s the real genius behind this movie): Over the course of the last decade, it has become more and more evident that women’s worst enemies are often hiding right under their noses.

Without giving too much away, the movie’s really about the rising trend of performative ‘feminist allyship’ amongst male millennials and how that has spawned a new brand of ‘wolves in sheep’s clothing’. 

It’s also about how class informs our fears. It’s like if you went to the country and there was an old man living in a cabin next door and you just kind of saw a glimpse or two of him, then later you went to a party with a bunch of “sensitive seeming dudes”…who do you really think is going to kill you? Who’s the actual threat? The old guy is probably just stressing about his retirement fund or how the city’s new zoning laws are going to take away his business.

Q: If you had to describe the production in a word what would it be?

A: Cold!

Q: What is your favourite horror film?

This is, like, the hardest question I’ve ever been asked, so I’ll give some qualifiers:

Christmas Evil is my favourite Holiday horror

The Brood is my favourite Canadian Horror

The Blair Witch Project is my favourite found footage horror

Nosferatu the Vampyre is my favourite horror remake

The Texas Chainsaw Massacre 2 is my favourite horror sequel

Possession has my favourite scene in a horror film

The Mist has my favourite ending

The Descent scared me the most

Ms. 45 has my favourite premise

Angst has my favourite structure 

But if I’m being really honest with myself, I’ve seen The Shining more times than I can count so, by that metric, it wins.

You can watch Death Trip On-Demand right now!

I hope you enjoyed this interview

Luke

Death Trip: Why Can’t We All Just Love Our Neighbor

Death Trip is a horror film directed by James Watts. The plot sees a group of friends go and stay at their parents cottage, whilst staying there they start to learn troubling secrets about the neighbours, and after a while one of the number is found mutilated. The friends now find themselves trapped in a hostile environment.

The mystery of what is going on here, which I won’t ruin as this is fairly new, is one of the best I have seen in years: it really had me going, I thought I figured out what was going on early into the film, but boy was I wrong.

I found this film quite scary, which is surprising considering that the home invasion/ evil neighbours sub-genre has been done to death several times over at this point. I ended up liking and becoming attached to the characters, so when they faced annihilation it felt all the more weighty and made me very tense. The threat is very real and present throughout, even in scenes that seem happy and light there is always a little bit there.

My one issue with this film, only a slight one, is that there are a few pacing issues mainly in the beginning of the film that make it a bit of a slog, luckily the film picks up after the first twenty minutes, so it isn’t that bad.

Overall, an interesting take on the sub-genre.

Pros.

The story doesn’t go where you are expecting it to

The characters are feel real and relatable

A palpable sense of threat

Doing interesting things with the genre

Cons.

Pacing issues mainly in the first twenty minutes.

4/5

Reviewed by Luke

Flora and Ulysses: Saving The World One Donut At A Time

Flora and Ulysses is a family comedy film directed by Lena Khan. The plot focuses on young comic book fan and life cynic Flora (Matilda Lawler), who one day saves the life of a squirrel after it has an unfortunate accident with a robot hoover. Said squirrel (later called Ulysses), and Flora form a tight bond and, oh yeah and since its rebirth the squirrel now has super powers- that’s kind of important.

In describing this film on twitter the other day, I called it “the Paddington of 2021”, or something to that extent, and truly that is the biggest compliment I can bestow on this film. It is such a happy, enjoyable good time that you can’t help but fall in love with it.

Firstly, the narration and the dialogue are fantastic, not only are they often punchy they also make a few salient points about society- it is surprisingly sharp. Moreover, if you’re a comic book fan, such as I, then you will get extra enjoyment from this film and there are so many references and shout outs to very comics specific things that serve as loving easter eggs for long time fans of the medium.

As far as child actors go Lawler is actually terrific, she sells everything just as she should and does not overact/ or as child actors often do, underact. She fits the role perfectly. Moreover, her friendship with Ulysses might be one of the cutest things you have ever seen, it is so adorable and heart warningly wholesome that it made me want to own a pet squirrel.

Ben Schwartz play’s Floras dad and carries on this recent strong streak of films, seriously check out some of his recent offerings outside of this and Sonic he is really proving himself to be a talent to watch out for.

Overall, maybe the best Disney + original outside of Marvel and Star Wars- yes, even better than Soul.

Pros.

Flora and Ulysses

Ben Schwartz

The script

The comic book references

The ending

Cons.

None

5/5

It is pure wholesome goodness

Reviewed by Luke

Son Of The South: Anyone Can Be A Hero

Son Of The South is a biographical drama film directed by Barry Alexander Brown. The plot retells the early life of civil rights activists Bob Zellner (here played by Lucas Till), showing his early struggles and triumphs.

There have been many films where Till has been good, but he never stood out enough with a film to deserve awards and to break through into wider Hollywood, this however is that film. Till deserves awards for this one, this is his breakout film or should be at least.

This film was near perfect in every way, there was only one slight issues with it, can you guess what it is? Anyone who has been following my reviews for a while know damn well how I feel about Lucy Hale, (she can’t act and ruins any film that features her prominently, with Fantasy Island being the one film that made me question that statement), and the same could have been true here: thankfully after the first half an hour this film ditches here. Her half an hour performance isn’t good, but that almost goes without saying.

This film is important as it shows that no matter where you come from in life, you can help to better the world. Zellner’s own grandfather was in the Klan and threatened to kill him for helping the civil rights struggle, but despite his family Zellner went on to help change history. We truly can all be heroes.

There were a number of powerful scenes here, including the lynching scene and the riot at the bus station, that hit hard and leave an impact; this was not long ago in our history and have we come all that much further since? Really? So a mixture of despair for the monster that is the human race, but also a hope that the good can beat the bad in our world to a point where words like the Klan and White Supremacy lose their meaning and can be forgotten about permanently.

Overall, I can’t recommend this film enough, please watch it.

Pros

Lucas Till

The powerful message

The emotional impact

It leaves you thinking after watching

Cons.

Lucy Hale

4.5/5

Reviewed by Luke