Dementer: Cults Can’t Live With Them, Can’t Maintain The Safety Of Those Around You Without Them.

Dementer Is a horror film directed by Chad Crawford Kinkel. The plot sees Brandy (Brand Edmiston), escape a rural cult, later taking upon work at an assisted living facility for adults with special needs: to try and make up for her dark past. However, that very dark past threatens to tear back into her life and effect those closest to her.

The horror in this film is very effecting, mainly because it is so personal and human. As I have said in other reviews, with demons and ghost there is a degree of fantasy there you can convince yourself after the film that they don’t exist. However, the threats in this film, cults, and local evil is very real and not as easily pushed from one’s mind.

Edmiston make for a solid lead, we like her and want to see her life turn around and it does that despite the challenges she faces. Honestly, the personal journey her character goes through in this beautiful and very well constructed.

My one critique of the film would be that there are several lulls over the course of the film where things slow down, these bits lost my attention and took me out of the film. Moreover, the ending also doesn’t feel as satisfying as it should and instead feels rushed which makes the film end on a sour note

Overall, a very harrowing film that despite a few lulls and a botched ending manages to scare and leave a mark on the viewer.

Pros.

The scares

The very real sense of danger

Edmiston

Cons.

The lulls

The supporting characters need more development

The ending felt a little rushed

3/5

Reviewed by Luke

Interview with Alexander Jeremy The Writer/Director Of F r e d And Milk Run

Written by Luke Barnes

Hey Everyone! I recent had the chance to sit down and chat to Alexander Jeremy, the writer director behind f r e d and the lockdown thriller Milk Run.  We talk about filming during lockdown, dancing through grief and the films of Russian cinematic giant Andrei Tarkovsky. I hope you enjoy!

Q: Who is your filmmaking inspiration?

A: I think it’s quite a lot of things actually. Film wise, from super strange niche stuff, like Tarkovsky/Bresson or something like that; things that kind of push the boundaries. Then on the flip side, pretty straight down the line films like Star Trek, The Last Samurai and the Avengers movies! I also get a lot of inspiration from music and the whole music world. I love weird electronic music and rap.

Q: Do you have any funny on set stories?

A: Not particularly hilarious but just one of those unexpected moments whilst filming; in f r e d, there’s a bit where Fred dances through a restaurant. We just shot that with no prep and no warning to the restaurant (naughty) – but at the end, a random guy started dancing with him. I love things like that.

Q: How would you describe the production of either F r e d or Milkrun?

A: F r e d was my first serious “piece”. Everyone was going out on a limb and we had no idea what it was going to turn out like, it felt a lot like a train in motion and we just kept up a long with it. Milkrun was strange, because I shot everything by myself on the cheapest of gear I could afford. So it was incredibly rough and “lofi” as I call it, it was not at all like a proper set – but I quite like that, makes it feel more like a bunch of kids with cameras. I think we should value short films made with nothing that are rough around the edges, as opposed to super high-budget, professional ones, clean ones – I always find them less interesting, (less risk?).

Q: How would you describe your experience with Lockdown filmmaking? 

4. It’s been an incredible time for me as a filmmaker, you’d think it’d be the opposite. If you’re willing to accept that shooting in Lockdown with nothing is probably not going to get you into Cannes or Sundance, and you can focus more on the love of it, practice, play etc – then in that sense, it’s been lovely. The super affordable gear and equipment these days are making filmmaking so accessible, it’s awesome. I want a Black Magic Pocket 6k Pro very badly!!

Q: How key was tapping into the fear and paranoia of the British lockdown for Milk Run? How close to life was your spoof?

A:  I love the old silent films, so I wanted to do something like that – also because it meant I wouldn’t need sound which cuts costs massively and makes everything much easier to shoot. In terms of the paranoia, and especially at that time (during the end of the second lockdown), you’re constantly in waves between paranoia and “fuck it”. I myself have probably swayed too far in each direction at one point, so I guess I wanted it to be a reminder not too swing too far in any direction.

Q: If you could go back in time to when you were a filmmaker first starting out what would you say to yourself?

A: Make more, keep going, be patient…and what I try to tell myself now is to focus on the fun, the joy, the creating, making good work – and try to forget about everything else. I think focusing on your “career” might make your work mediocre. 

Q: With F_r_e_d what was vital to you when trying to convey the grief on screen?

A: Just the silence, I think. How someone is there, with you, every day and then isn’t. Also, that with grief you cry one minute, dance the next, cry, then laugh, then numb, then cry – all over the place.

Q: Dance is obviously a central part of the narrative in f r e d, why is that and how did the idea come about?

A: F r e d ended up a very ambiguous piece, people read lots of different things into it – so I don’t really want to say too much. However, I’ll say the dance came from the fact that it’s so opposite to grief, and I thought it would suit Fred’s character – you can’t place him, he feels more like a force, a spirit, then a living person. 

Q: Sequel ideas or potential new endeavours?

A: No sequels in the works! Just more projects. I have another film coming out very soon, called Crowning, written by Hannah May Jessop. That film I think continues to explore stylistically some things I was tapping into with f r e d; a kind of stylistic awkwardness, anti-cinematic – to make you feel slightly unnerved – it’s not following the cinematic rules that we take comfort in, so you don’t know what it will do. Then, combining that with the silent era call-backs of Milkrun. Let’s see what happens with it! Please follow @crowningfilm !!

Q: If you ever win an Oscar or other award who would you thank in your acceptance speech?

A:  My Mum and Dad, my late friend Josh, and Keith Johnstone. (And agent + wife I imagine!)

You can check out F r e d and Milk Run, on Youtube, Vimeo and other streaming services now and of course you can check out reviews of both on my site now!

The Map Of Tiny Perfect Things: My 1000th Post!

The Map Of Tiny Perfect Thing is a romantic comedy film directed by Ian Samuels. The plot sees two people stuck in a time loop together, though they don’t realise this until a little bit into the film, who decide to make a map of all the perfect things that happen in their loop in hopes of better understanding it.

I have said before the time loop concept is quickly becoming dried up and samey, however, this film narrowly avoids feeling repetitive, and instead manages to still feel real, genuine and dare I say it fresh.

The romance between Mark (Kyle Allen) and Margaret (Katheryn Newton), feels heart warming and rootable, there are no troublesome elements as there often are in romantic comedies, I am pleased to report. I thought of the two performances Newton vastly outperforms Allen, and it was her character and her journey that made the film.

For the time loop to end, Margaret needs to do something, as she has effectively caused the loop itself: when she finally takes action and crosses that line it really adds to the strengths of the film in a dramatic sense and helps to elevate it in my opinion.

My only issue with the film is that it can be a little too mushy and over sentimental at times and has a very teen feeling to it, which is not a knock against the film as no doubt they are the target audience, but it does put me off a little bit.

Overall, a nice couple watch that though not perfect is entertaining.

Pros.

Using the time loop concept in a way that didn’t feel played out

Newton

The central relationship

The ending

Cons.

Overly sentimental

4/5

Reviewed by Luke  

Minari: The American Dream

Minari is a drama film directed by Lee Issac Chung. The plot follows the life of a South Korean/ American family as they try and achieve their own version of the American dream. The film explores themes of family, and legacy and what it means to be a success.

This is a beautiful film on many levels and deserves all the awards, not just Best Foreign Film or some other token: looking at you Golden Globes, sort your racism out.

There is something about this film, something that is hard to put into words. You spend half the film afraid that something bad is going to happen, there is this sinister sense of foreboding that hangs over the film, but it often leads to subversion. The bad things that do happen are not what you are expecting them to be, and as a result surprise you and that surprise cause you to revaluate how you see things and what you view as important.

All the performances are excellent here, Steven Yeun and Han Ye-ri are deserving of all the awards buzz they are getting, both of their performances carry a lot of emotional weight and resonance.

However, the performance I would most like to focus on as I think he often gets ignored, both in this film and others, is that of Will Patton. Patton plays a kind hearted neighbour who helps out the Yi family, and who the rest of the town thinks is odd. Patton fully sinks into this character and brings to the front a truly rounded character that is not defined by any one thing, and who does not overshine anyone, but who does impress while he is on screen. Patton truly makes the most out of his supporting role.

Finally, I would like to draw attention to relationship between David (Alan Kim) and Soon-ja (Youn Yuh-jung). It is not often we get films that reflect on the grandmother, grandson relationship as this one does, but it is much appreciated. Personally I thought this was the sweetest part of the film, watching the relationship bloom between the two of them over the course of the film (as David as never met her prior to the events of the film), it brought a tear to my eye.

Overall, one of the best films I have seen in a long time. Wholesome, lovely and truly special.

Pros.

The grandmother/grandson focus

Analysing the American dream

Yeun and Ye-ri

Patton

The emotional impact

Cons.

None

5/5

Reviewed by Luke    

Framing Britney Spears: Justin Timberlake Is A Bad Dude

Framing Britney Spears is a documentary film directed by Samantha Stark. The film explores the ideas around the #freeBritneyMovement and the fact that despite being only 39, Britney Spears has been under a conservatorship since 2008, with her father managing her estate and finances: this film aims to understand why that is.

This will make you angry, there is no other response you can have. It highlights flaws within the American legal system that are rife for abuse, it shows how the public’s obsession with celebrities can lead to destroying said celebrities life, and finally it show us just how sleazy Justin Timberlake is; in case you didn’t already know.

I think in terms of professionalism this is a solid documentary, as they speak to knowledgeable people on the matter and stick to the facts. Unlike other recent documentaries such as Netflix’s one about Elisa Lam, this documentary only gives a limited amount of time to online sleuths and activists, which makes for a more believable watch as you are not being bombarded with conspiracy theories.

I think the documentary is very needed, it deals with issues surrounding how women are treated in our society and the additional spot lights they are placed under, it is a very saddening watch especially when considering the impacts of self-reflection on how we the viewer see celebrities, though it does end with a message of hope, which personally I needed.

Overall, a well-done documentary.

Pros

Limiting the amount of online sleuths featured in the documentary

Using knowledgeable sources that had close ties to Spears

Causing inward reflection on celebrity

Pointing out holes in the legal system

Cons.

It is too short.

4/5

Reviewed by Luke

Dog Day Afternoon: The Most Unlucky Bank Robber Ever

Written By Luke Barnes

Dog Day Afternoon is a crime film directed by Sidney Lumet. The plot follows a failed bank robbery carried out by Sunny Wortzik (Al Pacino), and the following hostage crisis. The film is based on the real-life experiences of John Wojtowicz.

This film is regarded by many as a classic, and in some ways I can see that.

I think the performance from Pacino is sublime, he makes what could have easily just been a tired bank robber bad guy role, or generic antihero, feel layered and human. Pacino’s Sunny is not just likeable, he morphs into more than that almost becoming a Robin Hood figure. When the tale reaches its inevitable end, you feel sad as you wanted him to succeed, and both of those emotions are a result of Pacino’s near perfect performance.

Moreover, this film does a lot for transgender representation, decades ahead of the curve. Though some might not like it when I bring up social political ideas in my reviews of old films, I will anyway. I think the trans representation here deserves praise, as it treats the character with dignity and agency, rather than turning them into a cliché or a punchline.

My issue with this film though that stops it from getting full marks is that the film does have some noticeable pacing issues. There are sections inside the bank that drag on, and it is a shame as these scenes for the most part provide terrific character work, but there are moments when you are left wishing something would happen, or that the film would cut back to what is going on outside.

Moreover, before I made a comparison to Robin Hood with this film and I don’t view that entirely as a positive. The idea of Robin Hood works, but as the narrative follows this approach it becomes overly simplistic to a degree, the misguided but doing it for the right reasons bank robber and the evil police feel a little on the nose, and obvious and the film could have  benefited from focusing more on the grey neutral ground, within and also binding the two characters.

Overall, a reverting heist film with a surprisingly good about of representation.

Pros

Pacino

The characters are all handled well and with care

The transgender romance and the larger representation

The ending

Cons.

A few pacing issues

Occasionally too simplistic in its writing

4/5

Monster Hunter: We Need Cat Chefs And We Need Them Now

Monster Hunter is a science fiction action film directed by Paul W.S Anderson, loosely based on the Monster Hunter series of video games. The plot sees a group of soldiers be transported to a world unlike our own, with the major difference being cat people and giant monsters.

So before we get into this review I just want to say I have not really played A Monster Hunter game before so I can’t say how faithful this film is or isn’t to the games. I can say that some of the elements that I have heard people talk about seem to bleed over.

Paul W.S Anderson gets a lot of very unnecessary hate as a director, I really don’t get it, with the exception of Pompeii, and the final Resident Evil film I have enjoyed everything he has done, and this is no different. Very much like Zack Snyder or Michael Bay, Anderson’s focus is on the visuals rather than the plot and as long as you understand that going in and check your expectations you are usually in for an entertaining time.

I think the best part of this film is the action scenes, both in terms of fighting the giant monsters (that actually look pretty good), and also in terms of the hand to hand fight scenes: in particularly I think the fight scene between Mila Jovovich’s Artemis and Tony Jaa’s Hunter is truly well done and the action feels very connective and visceral; I tip my hat to the choreographer.

Overall, an entertaining time with some nice visuals and fight choreography, is it going to be the best film you have ever seen? No. Though there are worse ways to spend an hour and forty-five minutes.

Pros.

Mila Jovovich

The fight scenes

Faithful to certain elements of the games

Cons.

A little bland at times

The story is very meh

3/5

Reviewed by Luke

Fun Moms Dinner: The Fun Part Is Dead On Arrival

Reviewed by Luke Barnes

Fun Moms Dinner is a comedy film directed by Alethea Jones; the plot sees a group of pre-school mums go on a night out together that quickly gets out of hand.

You have seen this film before, let’s get that out of the way now- there is nothing new or fresh with this film at all. It feels like a retread of a lot of the jokes and ideas from the Bad Moms films, though those films were better in almost every way.

I am not saying this film is bad, not quite, it is watchable but not much more than that. Adam Scott shines as an out of his depth dad and has some nice scenes that are very cutesy. Out of the four titular mums, none really shine. If I was forced to pick one to single out for praise it would probably be Toni Collette who even still is not at her best here.

This feels very much like a for the paycheck kind of film.

The humour, rather unsurprisingly didn’t work for me, again comedy is subjective, but personally I didn’t find a single joke funny, at best the ‘jokes’ are unfunny and at worst they are incredibly cringey and just awful

Overall, a very middling film, watchable, but not funny

Pros

Adam Scott

It is watchable

Cons.

It feels like it was done for the money by a lot of the cast

It is not funny

The jokes are bad cringe

1/5

Football Factory: Hooligans In The UK

Football Factory is a British sports drama film directed by Nick Love. The plot examines the rise in football hooliganism, examining the lives of those who live to fight. We follow Tommy Johnson (Danny Dyer), one such hooligan as he gets caught up in a feud between two sects of fans and is forced to revaluate his life.

I don’t know if I have mentioned this in my reviews before, but I am a huge Danny Dyer fan and have been for a while: Dog House, The Business, Severance, Human Traffic all classic Dyer fare, and this fits in amongst that pantheon, though it doesn’t have as much charm as some of the others and is definitely rougher around the edges.

It is kind of crazy how badly this film wants to be Trainspotting, there are multiple moments in this film that feel almost shot for shot the same, with slight tweaks to avoid being called out. The difference of course is one is a British classic and the other is a blatant rip-off; I’ll let you figure out which is which.

Danny Dyer has his usual laddish charm and is okay here, though this does feel very safe for him. I would dare say that Dyer is upstaged by Neil Maskell, who plays his on-screen best friend and who also has some of the best scenes in the film, managing to inject a bit more soul into the film than Dyer seems capable off.

There are several moments in this film that are clearly supposed to be funny or sad, but in both cases the film struggles to achieve either. The first death doesn’t feel hugely impactful as we don’t really know the character, and the final death doesn’t bare weight as the film has done little to make us care about the character. The humour is far weaker, and the film tries less hard at this aim; those who the film is based on might find it funny, but anyone outside of that small group would probably be hard pushed to find a laugh here.

Overall, it is passable Dyer content, no The Business, in fact don’t watch this film at and just check out The Business it is a much better.

Pros.

Dyer and his roughish ways

Neil Maskell is trying

Cons.

The characters aren’t likeable and that limits the films emotional impact

The humour doesn’t work

It drags in parts

2/5

Reviewed by Luke

Sacrifice: The Truth About The American Tourist

Sacrifice is a horror film directed by Andy Collier and Toor Mian. The plot sees Issac (Ludovic Hughes), and his pregnant girlfriend Emma (Sophie Stevens), venture to a remote Norwegian island to collect an inheritance after Issacs’s Mum dies. However, once they get there they start to realise that there is something sinister afoot.

I will give this film props for two things. Firstly, it perfectly captures everything wrong with the American tourist, assuming everyone who is not from the USA doesn’t speak English and then talking slower and louder to them, whilst also thinking that non-American customs are freaky and are something to be feared. It is funny to see an American film tell it like it is, in some cases, rather than try and pretend they aren’t like that.

The second thing I will commend this film for is Barbara Crampton. She is the standout performer here, though that isn’t hard, and completely excels as the town sheriff/ cult leader. She has moments of threat and menace and also moments when you warm to her slightly.

However, other than Crampton and honesty, this film has little else going for it and is bad. The film is painfully dull, and a lot of the runtime is devoted to just watching the main couple argue, and it goes on and on. When we aren’t being subjected to needlessly petty domestic squabbles, we are treated to a forced elder gods Lovecraft rip off storyline that feels like it comes out of nowhere and then ends abruptly.

Overall, don’t waste your time, let me waste my time for you. This film is poor, the same exact idea has been done before and has been done far, far better.

Pros.

The truth about the American tourist

Barbara Crampton

Cons.

It is dull

It is just a couple arguing for most of the runtime

The elder gods/ monster stuff just comes out of nowhere and is no way developed

It is not scary in anyway

1/5

Reviewed by Luke