Interview with Alexander Jeremy The Writer/Director Of F r e d And Milk Run

Written by Luke Barnes

Hey Everyone! I recent had the chance to sit down and chat to Alexander Jeremy, the writer director behind f r e d and the lockdown thriller Milk Run.  We talk about filming during lockdown, dancing through grief and the films of Russian cinematic giant Andrei Tarkovsky. I hope you enjoy!

Q: Who is your filmmaking inspiration?

A: I think it’s quite a lot of things actually. Film wise, from super strange niche stuff, like Tarkovsky/Bresson or something like that; things that kind of push the boundaries. Then on the flip side, pretty straight down the line films like Star Trek, The Last Samurai and the Avengers movies! I also get a lot of inspiration from music and the whole music world. I love weird electronic music and rap.

Q: Do you have any funny on set stories?

A: Not particularly hilarious but just one of those unexpected moments whilst filming; in f r e d, there’s a bit where Fred dances through a restaurant. We just shot that with no prep and no warning to the restaurant (naughty) – but at the end, a random guy started dancing with him. I love things like that.

Q: How would you describe the production of either F r e d or Milkrun?

A: F r e d was my first serious “piece”. Everyone was going out on a limb and we had no idea what it was going to turn out like, it felt a lot like a train in motion and we just kept up a long with it. Milkrun was strange, because I shot everything by myself on the cheapest of gear I could afford. So it was incredibly rough and “lofi” as I call it, it was not at all like a proper set – but I quite like that, makes it feel more like a bunch of kids with cameras. I think we should value short films made with nothing that are rough around the edges, as opposed to super high-budget, professional ones, clean ones – I always find them less interesting, (less risk?).

Q: How would you describe your experience with Lockdown filmmaking? 

4. It’s been an incredible time for me as a filmmaker, you’d think it’d be the opposite. If you’re willing to accept that shooting in Lockdown with nothing is probably not going to get you into Cannes or Sundance, and you can focus more on the love of it, practice, play etc – then in that sense, it’s been lovely. The super affordable gear and equipment these days are making filmmaking so accessible, it’s awesome. I want a Black Magic Pocket 6k Pro very badly!!

Q: How key was tapping into the fear and paranoia of the British lockdown for Milk Run? How close to life was your spoof?

A:  I love the old silent films, so I wanted to do something like that – also because it meant I wouldn’t need sound which cuts costs massively and makes everything much easier to shoot. In terms of the paranoia, and especially at that time (during the end of the second lockdown), you’re constantly in waves between paranoia and “fuck it”. I myself have probably swayed too far in each direction at one point, so I guess I wanted it to be a reminder not too swing too far in any direction.

Q: If you could go back in time to when you were a filmmaker first starting out what would you say to yourself?

A: Make more, keep going, be patient…and what I try to tell myself now is to focus on the fun, the joy, the creating, making good work – and try to forget about everything else. I think focusing on your “career” might make your work mediocre. 

Q: With F_r_e_d what was vital to you when trying to convey the grief on screen?

A: Just the silence, I think. How someone is there, with you, every day and then isn’t. Also, that with grief you cry one minute, dance the next, cry, then laugh, then numb, then cry – all over the place.

Q: Dance is obviously a central part of the narrative in f r e d, why is that and how did the idea come about?

A: F r e d ended up a very ambiguous piece, people read lots of different things into it – so I don’t really want to say too much. However, I’ll say the dance came from the fact that it’s so opposite to grief, and I thought it would suit Fred’s character – you can’t place him, he feels more like a force, a spirit, then a living person. 

Q: Sequel ideas or potential new endeavours?

A: No sequels in the works! Just more projects. I have another film coming out very soon, called Crowning, written by Hannah May Jessop. That film I think continues to explore stylistically some things I was tapping into with f r e d; a kind of stylistic awkwardness, anti-cinematic – to make you feel slightly unnerved – it’s not following the cinematic rules that we take comfort in, so you don’t know what it will do. Then, combining that with the silent era call-backs of Milkrun. Let’s see what happens with it! Please follow @crowningfilm !!

Q: If you ever win an Oscar or other award who would you thank in your acceptance speech?

A:  My Mum and Dad, my late friend Josh, and Keith Johnstone. (And agent + wife I imagine!)

You can check out F r e d and Milk Run, on Youtube, Vimeo and other streaming services now and of course you can check out reviews of both on my site now!

Red Dot: Taking The Originality Out Of The Netflix Original

Red Dot is a Swedish horror thriller film directed by Alain Darborg.  The plot sees a struggling young couple head up to the mountains for a hiking retreat to fix their issues before their child is born, however, once they head up the mountain they become the prey of a killer, a hunt for survival ensues. Real original I know.

Don’t waste your time with this please. I am a big defender of Netflix in a lot of ways, I think they are often given an unfairly hard time, however, when they release trash like this one can understand the hate. The film is deeply, and I do mean deeply unoriginal: this feels like the 4th or 5th time I’ve seen this premise done and it does not feel any fresher.

Moreover, the main couple, who I have no idea what they were called and don’t care to look it up, are two of the most bland and unlikeable characters ever put to film. The opening ten minutes is just them having argument after argument, yay? That’s interesting. To be frank with you by the time they made it up the mountain I already disliked them so much that I was hoping the killer would hurry up so I could lose less of my free time.

Everything about this film progresses as you would expect it to and there are no surprises.

Overall, the weakest Netflix original of 2021 so far.

Pros.

There are some pretty shots

Cons.

The main couple are awful, and you don’t care about them

It is not tense or scary

It is predictable

It is sorely unoriginal

0.5/5

Reviewed by Luke

Silk Road: Nick Robinson, You Can Do Better!

The Silk Road is a thriller film directed by Tiller Russell. The film serves to tell the real-life story of Ross Ulbricht (Nick Robinson), the founder of Silk Road: a website that functioned as Amazon for hardcore drugs.

I have been excited for this film for a while,

, there is a lot of interesting things about it, little details and such, and I was eagerly waiting to see how this film would show the story. Sadly, it chose to be generic and just like every other drug kingpin take down film out there. To say the films take on events lacked nuance would be a vast, vast understatement- it is morally simplistic.

The main thing I will give this film prompts for is finally giving me a Jason Clarke performance that I enjoyed. Clarke excels as the shady, but ‘doing it for the right reasons’ DEA agent tasked with bringing Ulbricht down, and his performance is easily the best thing about the film, Robinson was great in The Kings Of Summer and Love, Simon but was deeply milk toast here.

The ending also felt quite anticlimactic, they were building it up and building it up and then when it finally gave us an ending it was underwhelming, and I was left going ‘is that it’? I understand that is based on a true story so they are limited with what they can do with it, but in a writing and set up capacity there were issues with building and execution that really hampered the ending.

Overall, sadly, yet another generic crime film.

Pros.

 Clarke

A few interesting moments

Cons.

The ending

Simplifying the issue

Robinson

2/5

Reviewed by Luke

Paradise Cove: Pull Up Your Floor Boards

Paradise Cove is a thriller film directed by Martin Guigui. The plot sees a builder (Todd Grinnell), and his wife (Mena Suvari), move into a new beach house in Malibu, however, once they settle in they start noticing strange occurrences which are all a result of the crazy homeless lady who lives under their house: who seems none to keen on the new tenants.

So, when I put this on I thought I knew exactly where it was going, but boy was I wrong. This film serves to rewrite a lot of the home invasion sub-genre cliches and attempts to make the sub-genre great again. In that vein the writing is quite smart, and I appreciated that, the usual dumb horror movie mistakes don’t happen and the characters and the situation as a whole play out in a terrifyingly realistic way.

I found the horror of this film to be quite chilling as it could so easily happen in reality. The idea of someone living in your house with you, unbeknownst to you, has happened multiple times over the years and been covered in the news: in that vein it is hard to separate the threat in this film and view it as not real in the same way you would watching something like Halloween (the later ones when Michael gets Superpowers). I don’t know if I would say this film is scary, but it certainly is unsettling.

Overall, this film did what a good thriller/ horror should do and left me feeling unsettled and a little uncomfortable after watching it.

Pros.
It is unsettling

The premise is menacing

It keeps you on edge

The writing is strong and erases cliches

Cons.

The acting by the main couple is very so so

A few pacing issues

3.5/5

Reviewed by Luke

The Call: Who Lived In Your House Before You

The Call is a South Korean thriller film directed by Lee Chung-hyun. The plot revolves around two girls who live in the same house decades apart and who communicate with each other through a phone line. Through these conversations they manage to change the past and the future, however it comes with a cost

This film has one of the strangest tones I have ever seen, I don’t know if this is a feature of South Korean cinema and if it is then this comes down to my own ignorance, but I think it is just poorly done. There are moments in this film that are clearly trying to be scary and menacing, however, moments later their will be a joke, or a quirky line and it will destroy any of the tension in the scene.

The performances are okay, again nothing to write home about. They are believable enough, yet they don’t have any standout moments, in the history of horror/thriller movie protagonists they are just yet another forgettable face.

The film as a whole seems a little overfamiliar as well. Clearly, this film has been inspired by Japanese horror hits of the last 20 years though it can’t hope to replicate their eeriness. The film is based on a British, Puerto Rican film called The Caller, and that film also seems derivative.

Overall, the tonal inconsistencies ruin this film and stop it from ever being scary.

Pros.

It has a few scary moments.

Cons.

These are ruined by an inconsistent tone

The leads are forgettable

It does not make any sense

It feels overly familiar

1/5

Reviewed by Luke

The Girl In The Spiders Web: Can The Spider Hurry Up

The Girl In The Spiders Web is a thriller film directed by Fede Alvarez based on the Millennium book series written by David Lagercrantz. The plot sees Lisbeth Salander (Claire Foy), as she battles against a mysterious criminal organisation that has ties to her past.

I understand this property is well respected, the book this film is based on is held in high esteem: I have not read it myself so I can’t say, but what I will say is if the plot of this film is any indication for the  story and plot of the books they had been vastly over credited.

There was nothing here that I had not seen done better before elsewhere. Most of the twists and turns were painfully apparent from the get-go, and quite frankly I was bored watching it: there were big stretches within this film when I was desperately hoping for something interesting to happen, but it never did.

Foy is fine, is fine she has been a lot better elsewhere, but she is not out right terrible. The acting front much like everything else in this film is very meh, the one good performance and it is more a result of a styling and costume rather than actual acting is Claes Bang, as a villainous enforcer who has a great presences and a few interesting action moments.

Overall, deeply underwhelming.

Pros.

Claes Bang

Cons.

The performances are average

The script is boring and lazy

The plot is predictable

The action is fairly weak and run of the mill

1/5

Reviewed by Luke      

War: An Action Film Minus The Action

War is an action film directed by Phillip G. Atwell. The plot sees FBI agent Tom Lone (Jason Statham), track down the assassin (Jet Li), who killed his partner some time prior. A personal war ensues between the two men.

So usually one can enjoy Jason Statham action movies for the dumb spectacle they are, usually they are made better for not taking themselves seriously and for playing up the more campy elements. However, clearly this film did not get that memo, this film takes itself far, far too seriously to be any kind of fun, but more than that this film is boring.

Additionally, for an action film there is precious little action on display here, usually it is just a person walks into a room, shoots some people, then leaves, that is all there is too it. Even the final set piece at the end of the film is disappointing and surprisingly tame. This film seems to have a tell not show policy towards its action and it is all the worse for it.

On the performance side of things, Statham plays Statham as always but without any of the charm. Whereas Li has the presences but doesn’t actually do anything interesting for the entire film. Neither character has anything even barely resembling a personality and the whole film feels like a cliché wrapped in a stereotype.

Overall, this is one of the tamest most boring action films I have ever seen.

Pros.

None

Cons.

It is boring

It is tame

The characters aren’t fun to watch

The ending is disappointing

It is cliché and played out

0/5

Reviewed by Luke

Horizon Line: Running Out Of Fuel

Horizon Line is a thriller film directed by Mikael Marcimain. The plot follows a young will they wont they couple Jackson (Alexander Dreymon) and Sara (Alison Williams), as they become trapped on a plane out at sea after the pilot has a heart attack. Though Sara has rough knowledge of how to fly the plane, the ever-depleting fuel tank and lack of anywhere to land is turning into a nightmare scenario.

I have been waiting for months to see this film, due to the pandemic release dates being shuffled around and I have only just now got a chance to see it. I have to say for the most part it was quite disappointing.

I don’t know if it is because I went in with too high expectations, but most of this film just felt samey. It felt for the most part like yet another generic thriller that we have all seen hundreds of times before.

The acting as well was also very ordinary. This would have been Williams’ film to shine, but she does nothing: most of the film illudes to her character having some emotional baggage or more to her, but no she is just as dull as she appears. I don’t know whether it is Williams’ performance or whether it is the writing, but her character has no charm or personality whatsoever, which makes it hard to root for her and takes tension out of the film.

The only saving grace, was the sequence after they get out of the plane. It was an interesting twist to present us with the character safety to only then moments later take it away. However after this well-done piece of misdirection we then get the tease of a shark attack that never materialises, which I suppose could be put down to the filmmakers trying to subvert our expectations, but really it just felt disappointing again.

Also the sheer convenience of the ending reeks of bad writing.

Pros.

Some of the twists work

Cons.

Other twists don’t work

Williams’ is incredibly bland

It feels familiar yet also inferior

The tension dissipates when you realise that you don’t care about the characters at all

1/5

Reviewed by Luke

The Da Vinci Code: Hide Your Bibles

The Da Vinci Code is a mystery thriller film directed by Ron Howard. The plot follows Professor Robert Langdon (Tom Hanks) as he is drawn into a feud between two secrets sects of Christianity that have been around since the times of Christ.

Much like my previous review The Girl In The Spiders Web, this film came out to some fan fare as the book that predates the film is beloved, also much like that film this film struggles to meet those high expectations. I have not read the book but if the film is anything to go on, then it is about 1000 pages too long.

At times this film reminded me somewhat of the Nicolas Cage National Treasure films, though I prefer those. I think this film took itself far too seriously, which is fine as it is not supposed to be a comedy but at the same time some parts of the film were unintentionally hilarious.

Speaking off the Paul Bettany evil monk villain is easily the best part of the film. Yes, this character is hard to take seriously and is hilarious at times for all the wrong reasons, but at the same time he also has quite a few good moments including his final shootout and has a great on-screen presence and threat throughout.

Overall, the biggest issue with this film is that it is one for about an hour too long, as such the pacing is terrible and though the film has some high moments the long tedious stretches drag it down.

Pros.

Bettany

The mystery when it finally gets revealed

The world

Cons.

It is too serious

The hilarity within is unintentional

National Treasure did it better

Hanks is very average

2.5/5

Reviewed by Luke

Nina Of The Woods: The Most Boring Film Of 2020?

Nina Of The Woods is a thriller film directed by Charlie Griak. The plot follows the titular Nina (Megan Hensley), as she is brought into provide local flair during the shooting of a big foot documentary. Naturally as you would assume from this sort of film things quickly go wrong and become all too real.

So, I have no issue with mediative slow-burn horror films I love The Witch and The Wind, and I even have a soft spot in my heart for It Comes At Night, however I found this film pushed it too far. By that I mean to do slow burn horror right, you need to have an atmosphere that feels bleak and oppressive even if nothing actually scary is happening on screen. The issue here is that this film does not have an oppressive atmosphere of any kind, instead it is the slow brooding introspection of an art film this does not mix well with the type of film this is. Moreover, nothing happens for the first hour and I do mean nothing. Comparatively in Egger’s Witch the baby has gone missing and the family is under supernatural attack in the same amount of time. My point is that this film is just too slow to a point of becoming tedious.

The acting is fine, no one is good let alone memorable. The look of the film seems quite cheap which needn’t be the case as the Blair Witch Project, which this film so desperately wants to be, did a very similar thing with an equally small budget without looking cheap.

Overall, the filmmakers attempt to challenge the genre has deeply back fired and resulted in a film that is borderline unwatchable.

Pros

The film was not offensively bad

Cons.

It feels too long despite being short

It is a drag to watch

The approach taken by the filmmakers seems at odds with the genre

It is a bad attempt to replicate The Blair Witch

It is not as smart, or as deep, or as game changing as it thinks it is

0.5/5

Reviewed by Luke