Asteroid City: Are We Alone In The Universe

Summary

A group of people end up trapped out in the dessert where they are visited by an alien being.

As many of you know I am a big Wes Anderson fan, and as such there are things in this film that I can overlook especially as after The French Dispatch Anderson’s last and probably worst film I was in dire need of a good Anderson film again.

For the most part I thought the cast worked well and Anderson’s trademark quirk and charm was there in abundance for all to see. There are a number of good moments peppered in throughout the film, some cheer worthy even, and Jason Schwartzman anchored the film perfectly.

However, I would be remiss if I didn’t mention that this film feels very messy at times and I think Anderson tried to do too much, especially with the play inside of the film aspects of it, again this crossed back into stuff he was doing in The French Dispatch that didn’t work there or here. The film as a whole would have been better if Anderson had just tried to tell a linear story rather than trying to go for a more meta textual approach.

Overall, better in many ways than The French Dispatch but there is still some modern Anderson issues here, it is understandable for a filmmaker to want to try and shake things up, but these new changes can’t help but make you miss Anderson’s older films.

3.5/5

Pros.

An interesting narrative

Back to form

Anderson’s charming quirks

Solid performances across the board

Cons.

It comes across as a little smug at times

Pacing issues

If you enjoyed this review, then please head over to my Patreon to support me, I offer personalized shoutouts, the ability for you to pick what I review next, bespoke film recommendation to fit you as a person and full access to my Patreon exclusive game reviews. Check it out!

https://www.patreon.com/AnotherMillennialReviewer

Blackberry: The Rise And Fall Of A Titan

Written by Luke Barnes

Summary

The rise and fall of one of the most prolific mobile phone companies of the Noughties.

So let me start off by saying that this is a fantastic showing from Glenn Howerton. He is on top form here and really does prove that he has solid dramatic chops, it is a shame his agent has him doing sub-par series like Velma that totally waste his talents. Through and through this is Howerton’s film.

Moreover, as far as the rise and fall of x company films go this one was quite compelling and interesting for the first hour and a half, we’ll get to that other half an hour in just a moment. I found myself really interested and engaged with how the company was slowly losing its soul over time and thought that the cast did a really great job getting me to care about the characters.

However, it isn’t all sunshine and roses, within the last act of the film things go off the rails quickly, mainly they side-line Howerton’s character for big stretches which hurt the film a lot, and then they try to tie it all together with a montage of this is where they are now scenes at the end, this doesn’t work as it feels like after spending over an hour getting you to care about these characters the film just drops the ball with them at the end.

Overall, Howerton makes this film as good as it is, but the disastrous third act really hurts the film significantly.

3/5

Pros.

Howerton

The early pacing and the rise parts of the film

The soundtrack

Cons.

The last act really drops the ball

The final act also side-lines Howerton, a terrible move

https://www.patreon.com/AnotherMillennialReviewer

Ted Lasso: Season 3 Overview

Written by Luke Barnes

Summary

The friendly American football coach, played by Jason Sudeikis, goes home.

The final season of a much beloved show like Ted Lasso was always going to be sad and this was sad but it was also disappointing. As the credits rolled on the final episode of the third season I released that in a sense the show had peaked with the second season and maybe should have ended there.

Though I enjoyed most of the character work this season did, and the endings that most of the characters got, I also thought that at times it was overly indulgent. By that I mean it would go to a place of being overly sentimental, it would spend vast sections of episodes dedicated to the fate of a very minor character in the scheme of things and yes whilst it may have been well done it felt like filler as the actual story of the season was relatively short.

Moreover, the decision to make Ted sad, which really was a second season development, came back to hurt the show as it could no longer really pull off the quaint small town charm and positivity that had worked in the first season so well. Giving the character depth and complexity was a good thing and I am not saying he should have stayed a one note caricature but I think they took Ted’s sadness too far, so much so that it gives the third season a real sense of heaviness that sits within until its closing moments.

Overall, the third season was still good don’t get me wrong, but it was a noticeable step back from the other seasons and clearly evidenced at times the need for the show to end as it was becoming long in the tooth.

3/5

Pros.

It does some good character work

It has a number of sweet moments

It has some of the same charm as the earlier seasons/

Cons.

It is overly sentimental at times to the point of feeling indulgent

There is a lot of what can only be described as filler

https://www.patreon.com/AnotherMillennialReviewer

Reality: The US’s Further Edging Towards Fascism

Written by Luke Barnes

Summary

The story of Reality Winner, here played by Sydney Sweeny, and her arrest.

This film made me angry. It so perfectly points out and captures the American hypocrisy with their love affair with free speech only ever extending out to what they agree with. I think the film wants you to be angry at what happened to Reality, who at the end of the day was leaking information that was in the public good, not selling nuclear secrets to the North Koreans.

It is a thoroughly uncomfortable watch from start to finish as the film ramps up the tension and the claustrophobic nature of the raid. You like Reality within the film feel the walls closing in and increasing escalation.

Sweeny is terrific here and really gives a layered and nuanced performance, I think there is something so heart breaking about the fact that her life is over essentially and she just wants to make sure her animals are okay. Perhaps it is because I am not American and am fairly detached from their news cycle, but this film made me feel bad for Winner in real life and think that the US government want to bully their own citizens into maintaining this image of them being infallible when that just isn’t true.

Overall, this is a great anti-US protest peace illustrating the US’s increasing slip into being an authoritarian fundamentalist nightmare.

4/5

Pros.

Sweeny

The tension

The emotion

The core of the story and the message it has

Cons.

It is unpleasant to watch at times

https://www.patreon.com/AnotherMillennialReviewer

Yellowjackets Season 2 Overview

Written by Luke Barnes

Summary

Mysteries from the first season are tied up and new ones are born as the Yellowjackets sink further into the darkness.

This may be the first time I have written about Yellowjackets, I really got into the series last year and was eagerly awaiting this season, I was going to do an episode by episode series of reviews as I do with some shows but instead decided to do a broader season 2 retrospective as I don’t know how many of you would be interested in me doing weekly coverage. Do let me know if you are and I will do it for season 3.

For the most part I thought this second outing was more of the same, in the best way. It delivered on the character moments we had wanted to see since the first season, mostly noticeably getting together all the survivors, that we know off in the present day scenes. It also flushed out many of the mysteries from the first season in both the past and the present and it was nice to get those answers. Of course this is the kind of show wherein whenever they give you an answer hundreds more questions are posed.

The performances across the board were great throughout the season and that goes for both the flashback wilderness and present day scenes. If I had to pick a best for the season I would be split between Christina Ricci who does a lot more with Misty this season even getting a full on musical number, Elijah Wood who enters as a new character but by the end of the season immediately becomes a favourite or Sophie Nelisse who acts the hell out of her scenes this season.

My one complaint of this season would be that some of the storylines overstayed their welcome. Mainly I am talking about Shauna’s affair, and don’t get me wrong Shauna, played by Melanie Lynskey, is one of the best characters on the show and her storyline was interesting I just thought that they dragged it out for far too long. I think that it could have been condensed down and then the extra screen time could have been given to the other non-Misty Yellowjackets in the present day who needed a bit more attention.

Overall, one of the best show’s on TV, but a minor step back from the heights of the first season.

4/5

Pros.

The characters

The mystery

The style of the show

The ending

Cons.

Shauna’s present day storyline got a bit too much screen time

https://www.patreon.com/AnotherMillennialReviewer

Are You There God It’s Me, Margaret: Finding Out Which Faith Is Right For You

Written by Luke Barnes

Summary

An adaption of the Judy Blume book of the same name which tells the story of a young girl, played by Abby Ryder Fortson, coming of age and finding her place in the world.

I will preface this review by saying that I haven’t read the book this film was based on and am not very familiar with the works of Judy Blume.

I was excited to watch this film as the trailer gave off a very quirky sensibility, it reminded me of the works of Greta Gerwig and Wes Anderson. However, upon watching it I found it to be a much more straight forward coming of age tale then I was expecting. That is not necessarily a complaint as it was still enjoyable, and strong performances from most of the adult cast, especially Rachel McAdams, did a lot to elevate it.

I also thought the film’s focus on religion was interesting and nicely separated it out from a lot of other coming of age films that are obsessed with budding romances, dances and raging hormones. I liked that the film didn’t shy away from showing how much of a destructive force religion can be in some cases and that it tried to have more of a serious conversation on the topic. Sadly though, I will say that the conversation this film wants to have would have been made much better if it had gone just a little further, as what it is saying now is fairly surface level.

Overall, an interesting coming of age film that is boosted by its performances and decision to focus on religion over teenage angst.

3/5

Pros.

The focus on religion

McAdams, Bates and Safdie

It is fun

Cons.

It is a little surface level at times and an exploration of greater depth could have really been interesting

It has pacing issues in the form of second act lulls

https://www.patreon.com/AnotherMillennialReviewer

She Is Love: An Art House Rom-Com In All The Worst Ways

Written by Luke Barnes

Summary

A woman, played by Haley Bennett, traveling for business ends up staying at her ex-husband’s hotel.

So I will give this film props for trying to do something new with the standard rom-com formula, it does try and subvert some of the obvious cliches and that is to be applauded. However, instead of presenting tired and worn cliches the film instead encompasses a bunch of pretentious art house tosh that makes little to no sense and will leave you scratching your head.

The relationship held between the romantic leads, played by Bennett and Sam Riley, is deeply toxic, though I suppose that is sort of the point of the film. Yet you never really get to understand the ins and outs of it all as the conversations and wider narrative of the film seems to want to jump between things rapidly. The effect of this jumping around is disorientating and off putting.

Overall, though it tries to do something new this film falls headfirst into the well of pretentious art house nonsense.

1.5/5

Pros.

It is short

Bennett is trying.

Cons.

It makes little narrative sense

It is pretentious

The leads have no chemistry at all

It manages to have pacing issues despite being fairly short

https://www.patreon.com/AnotherMillennialReviewer

Paint: Wes Anderson Without The Charm Or The Heart

Written by Luke Barnes

Summary

A quasi parody of Bob Ross, mixed with an original story, creating a mess.

I am a big fan of Owen Wilson and so his presence drew me to this film. Upon watching it I can say that Wilson himself was good, but that he was probably the only good thing about the film ultimately.

The parody elements didn’t work, and the humour of the film felt incredibly flat. At times I didn’t know whether the film wanted me to view it as a comedy or as more of a drama as they try and put in character work, which suggests it views itself as more of a character piece, but ultimately this doesn’t help to make the film funnier or the characters more likable.

Building upon that the message of the film is all over the place, on the one hand we are told to like Wilson’s character and root for him in this journey to find new meaning in his life, but on the other he is shown to be a massive creep and all round pretty crummy, so which is it? I understand the film is shooting for the more nuanced answer of the character being bad but then turning it around, however, it just feels confused and not fully thought out.

Overall, barely even passable, if you miss this one don’t sweat it.

2/5

Pros.

Wilson

It is short

Cons.

The character work is confusing

It isn’t funny

It takes itself a bit too seriously at times

https://www.patreon.com/AnotherMillennialReviewer

The Hard Life And Times Of Clownie Volume 1: The Struggles After Clown College

Written by Luke Barnes

Summary

Clownie finally gets a feature.

So this film is the full adaption of the Hey Bro short I reviewed a while back and I have to say in a lot of ways this film is a step up. Everything that was enjoyable about the original short is here in spades and the film does justify its need for a longer runtime.

I liked that we got to explore the characters a lot more and learn more about their lives. I think the added character work added a nice new dimension to the world of the film and made me care more about these characters. As I was watching I found myself quite often relating to the characters I think they certainly feel more realised here and that is very much a good thing.

The one area in which I would criticise this film, however, is in terms of its pacing. I thought that the second act was overly long and at times felt like it was padding for time. This is a shame as the first and third act both move along at a nice place and are very enjoyable, it is just the slow down in the middle that hampers my enjoyment of the feature more broadly.

Overall, a good expansion, but the slow second act really bogs it down.

4/5

Pros.

The character work

Expanding the world

It justifies its existence

Relatable

Cons.

A slow second act

https://www.patreon.com/AnotherMillennialReviewer

Interview With Writer/Director Harry Wells: Clockwork

Written by Luke Barnes

I recently had the chance to interview Writer/ Director Harry Wells about their new anthology film Clockwork. In this interview we discuss, script writing, making the most out of what you have and the wonders of the iPhone headphones mic in low-budget filmmaking.I hope you enjoy.

Q: How did you get started as a filmmaker?

HW: I started out as a screenwriter, for around two-three years I was entering the screenwriting competitions and getting some wins along the way and then last year I was able to secure two write-for-hire jobs which eventually sold and will hopefully find their way into production this year. I always loved the idea of making a short film, and filmmaking as a whole is an avenue that I’d always wanted to go down, plus I really wanted something out there with my name on it – just to effectively give me another advantage within the industry.

So, around Christmas time last year I was watching (yearly tradition) It’s a Wonderful Life and I really felt inspired to make something similar to that and really catch that feeling of warm nostalgia along with the importance of family around Christmas. So, I sat down and wrote the script for Clockwork. I sent the script around to some trusted friends and they all said the same thing – “you have to make this.”

With that, I decided, with barely any knowledge on filmmaking nor any idea where to really start, that I was going to make my first short film.

Q: How would you describe micro-budget filmmaking?

HW: A challenge, but a fun-creative challenge. You have to be strategic in all aspects, as you’re working with barely any money, cast, or crew. So everything you do, has to fit within them standards. Even when writing the script, you have to keep in mind what you’re realistically going to be able to shoot. I didn’t really follow the “set rules” of shooting a film – there wasn’t so much a schedule nor a fixed timescale – it was about as amateur as filmmaking can really get, but in a way, that made it rewarding, because we ended up something great for virtually nothing. I just believed that if I had an iPhone, some trusted friends and a good script, we could make a good amateur film.

Q: Would you say that micro-budget filmmaking is better or worse than filmmaking on a larger budget?

HW: Having never really had the experience of large-scale filmmaking it would be unfair of me to really compare the two. But I could throw the positives and negatives of micro-budget filmmaking forward – there’s less pressure, as you’re making something with nothing. It’s a massive learning experience and pure trial and error. I done SO many things wrong but you need these mistakes to learn, and they can only improve you ready for the next film. I really do think it can only help you once you step up to large budget filmmaking, as you’ll have so much more people working with you and having a big team together can only push you in the right direction. For example : I wrote, directed, shot, and edited Clockwork, the writing and directing was fun. But I am not an editor. To say I struggled with it would be an understatement and I definitely feel for my next film hiring an editor will be an essential. Where-as, on a large budget project, an editor will already be in place.

Q: What are some of the trails and challenges you have had to face as a filmmaker?

HW: Oh, there were many – around the time of shooting, there was a nasty storm heading over the South East, strong winds, heavy rain, etc..etc… and we were shooting in the loft of a local theatre, so the sound of wind and rain clattering against the roof made the audio unusable. We also happened to have a power cut just as we finished setting up the set ready for filming! Thankfully, the power cut didn’t last too long, but safe to say I was fearing the worst.

Then, on the outdoor shoots, we were shooting by a church and the scene was set in the 50s, something we couldn’t avoid was people walking within the shot. And obviously a person in jeans and trainers holding an iPhone was not something you’d normally see in 50s, so although they had every right to be there they also naturally were curious as to what was going on – we had to politely ask them to step out of our shot… some took it better than others!

Another big issue – sound. We originally had a boom mic, which was perfect, until I started to realize it wasn’t picking up any sound. Great. So I bought two cheap mics online… everything seemed to be going smoothly until I (the foolish amateur filmmaker) got home and looked over the footage – the mics had broken early doors and our actors sounded like two robots having an argument in the middle of a malfunction, again, something you didn’t really get in the 50s! So, we done it again with non-other than an iPhone headphone mic wrapped around the boom-pole and kept on with some sellotape! Sounds laughable when I look back at it now, but believe it or not, it actually worked pretty well!

Q: Do you have any tips for someone starting out in filmmaking?

HW: My advice would be just to do it. Pick up a smart phone, get some friends together and go out there and shoot something. You will learn so much about filmmaking, and you really never know where it could take you. I think filmmaking is more accessible to everyone now than it ever has been. So pick up on the momentum and just make something great.

Q: How did you shoot and make Clockwork with no budget or backing?

HW: I wrote the script knowing there would be no money towards it, so kept that heavily in mind. And then it was just asking for favours. I went around a few clock shops in my local area, none of them wanted me filming in there, which was fair enough. Then, my good friend at the local theatre said I could come along and check out the loft – it was perfect, a cosy little corner to build a clock workshop. Then it was purely just friends coming along and helping out with filming. We had some late nights and early mornings, but it was all worth it. I really hope the film can be seen as an inspiration to anyone wanting to make a film, but not having the budget or backing – Clockwork has now picked up multiple awards – it’s entirely possible to make a decent film with nothing!

If you enjoyed this interview, then please head over to my Patreon to support me, I offer personalized shoutouts, the ability for you to pick what I review next, bespoke film recommendations to fit you as a person and full access to my Patreon exclusive game reviews. Check it out!

https://www.patreon.com/AnotherMillennialReviewer