Timestalker: One Of The Most Unlikable Characters In Cinema History

Summary

A woman, Alice Lowe, reincarnates over and over again chasing after a guy who doesn’t like her back.

This film was a vanity project much like Woman of the Year, review coming soon. Lowe’s other films have also drawn from her own life, but here not only is she actor and star but the whole film is an effort in narcissism. This is textual meaning that in the plot of the film the central character and her desire is the plot of the film, there is nothing more to it than that, there is no character growth, she likes the guy then eventually realises he will never be the one for her but then ends the film with him liking her causing a character development regression and undoing the growth.

To make matters worse the film has nothing to say, it is about a thin as a McDonalds paper bag, it is shallow and the character unlikable. You may root or care for her if she wasn’t so self-involved yet she is so you don’t. The film borrows a lot from the dark comedies of Ben Wheatley yet unlike his work in say Sightseers for example, there is no subtext here no broad commentary and crucially no jokes.

I don’t think I laughed once during the entirety of the film, and I would say that no one else in the entire cinema did, but then no one else was there.

Overall, I think it is sad that films like this get made because in British circles Lowe is a minor name, a better film that could have made more and been more highly praised could have been made with this money.

1/5

Pros.

It is relatively short

Cons.

It isn’t funny

It is boring

It has nothing to say

Lowe isn’t very good in it

If you enjoyed this review, then please head over to my Patreon to support me, I offer personalized shoutouts, customised film recommendations to suit your personality and tastes, the ability for you to pick what I review next and full access to my Patreon exclusive game reviews. Check it out!

https://www.patreon.com/AnotherMillennialReviewer

Or if you would rather send me a donation if Patreon isn’t for you then please find a link to my donations page below

Help Support My Reviews

Smile Two: Nothing To Smile About

Summary

The smiling demon is back again.

Honestly I was fairly lukewarm on the first film in this series as it was plain to see just how derivative of It Follows it was, however, I did think it had some redeeming moments. This one does not.

For a start you have a main character, Naomi Scott, who is so unlikeable you are rooting for the monster throughout, which is not what the film wants. The reason why she is so unlikable is because she is so whiny and self-involved, she is constantly the victim whilst whining and being a diva.

Follow this up with a film that is just manically depressing, not scary, which a lot of modern horror films seem to get muddled up. The film is just oh these terrible people do bad things and then go insane and pass it on, it just feels grim and dark. There is no levity or even camp to it.

The ending I think is the worst part of the whole film. So from the moment they announced that the new lead character was going to be a singer the ending was obvious. The singer would end the film killing themselves in front of thousands of people passing on the demonic virus at a massive scale, creating pandemonium. I was right.

Overall, there is nothing new, novel or even remotely scary about this film, scratch that there is a scare here, that it will likely get a sequel.

1/5

Pros

The songs were catchy

Cons.

It isn’t scary

The woman is unlikable

It is too long

It has a predictable ending

If you enjoyed this review, then please head over to my Patreon to support me, I offer personalized shoutouts, customised film recommendations to suit your personality and tastes, the ability for you to pick what I review next and full access to my Patreon exclusive game reviews. Check it out!

https://www.patreon.com/AnotherMillennialReviewer

Or if you would rather send me a donation if Patreon isn’t for you then please find a link to my donations page below

Help Support My Reviews

Cinema Issues: The Truth About Toxic Fans

Written by Luke Barnes

In this cinema issues article we are discussing the currently pushed idea of the toxic fan and using some critical thinking skills.

So firstly it would be remiss to say that no elements of racism and bigotry exist in fandom or that people getting doxed or sent death threats doesn’t happen as it does, by both sides frequently. There are always bad apples in every bunch, however, things are being twisted.

The first thing to address is the matter of proportion, this is that within a fandom be they left right or whatever there will be bad apples, but they are a small number, to say a whole fandom is anything based on a few people is inherently in bad faith.

Onto the next point, misuse. So people online use terms like racist and bigot like they are going out of fashion and crucially they use them incorrectly. The most common way of this is that they say anyone who says something they don’t like or who criticises something they like is bigoted. This is not only silly and degrading to the terms themselves but also it leads then for the echo chamber to echo that now the fandom are all bigoted when they may not be at all and the original inciting incident was just someone saying they didn’t like the sound design of a film.

A final thing to consider is the idea of tribalism and scapegoats, it is very nice for a studio when a film comes out and does badly to go we didn’t make a bad film the fans are just toxic. Moreover, those who like the film can just rally behind that line and not thinking critically buy into it and go yeah I really liked it so anyone that doesn’t must have another reason for not liking it, enter the they are bigots line.

Overall, whilst there is and always will be an element of toxicity in fandoms, criticising a film, casting choice, plot point or whatever is non toxic, someone disliking a film you like is non toxic, someone saying they didn’t like the costumes in a show is not bigoted or racist and you are devaluing those terms by using them so casually. The war against toxic fans by some online and by studios is not only blown up way out of proportion and enflamed by political tribalism, but also unwinnable and frankly wrongheaded. As often a lot of the people who are calling people toxic are being that themselves by going after people they don’t like online.

If you enjoyed this piece, then please head over to my Patreon to support me, I offer personalized shoutouts, customised film recommendations to suit your personality and tastes, the ability for you to pick what I review next and full access to my Patreon exclusive game reviews. Check it out!

https://www.patreon.com/AnotherMillennialReviewer

Or if you would rather send me a donation if Patreon isn’t for you then please find a link to my donations page below

Help Support My Reviews

Megalopolis: At Least Aubrey Plaza Seems To Be Having Fun

Summary

An old man believes his own hype and makes a mess he calls art.

For all of you who may defend this film and call it art don’t bother. Too often these days if a film flops or is a trainwreck there will be a small group of people, be they political bed fellows of the film’s message or just those wanting to seem cool by liking something everyone else doesn’t.

The issue with films like this is that it makes studios more hesitant to take chances on other big budget films in the future that might be a bit more risky and for what an old man’s vanity. The writing was on the wall for this film when it struggled to get distribution plus the fact thar Coppola’s last few films have been pretty bad.

Rather unsurprisingly this is a mess, it has neither fully formed characters or anything you could call a plot, it is just a series of people and things loosely tied together. The narrative post release is that it is art and supposed to be hard to understand and to figure out, but that just sounds like an excuse to be trash to me.

Overall, Coppola should have stuck to making wine.

0.5/5

Pros.

It is funny bad at times

Cons.

It makes no sense

It has no story

The cast are wasted

If you enjoyed this review, then please head over to my Patreon to support me, I offer personalized shoutouts, customised film recommendations to suit your personality and tastes, the ability for you to pick what I review next and full access to my Patreon exclusive game reviews. Check it out!

https://www.patreon.com/AnotherMillennialReviewer

Or if you would rather send me a donation if Patreon isn’t for you then please find a link to my donations page below

Help Support My Reviews

Velma: Mindy Kaling’s Career Just Won’t Die

Summary

Velma, voiced by Mindy Kailing, cannot do us all a favour and die and so has to come back as a snarky and thoroughly unlikeable ghost.

Bitter is the word I would use to describe this special, bitter was a word that encapsulated the whole of Velma’s run. Now I know that it was possible but unlikely that win they filmed this they knew it had been cancelled, but it feels as though this special is aware of its cancellation and wants to get in as many jabs as it can in order to settle scores.

We get a repeat of all of Kailing’s classic lines, such as how she fetishes white guys whilst also having all her characters be super liberal and hate them. She is quirky and insecure yet demands to be the centre of attention all the time. Finally who could forget making the whole affair as sordid and needlessly unpleasant just for the hell of it. It was always clear that Kailing and co had no respect for the source material when they made this show but once again we get that point hammered home for us.

Does this special serve as a fitting end for the series? No, ultimately it chooses to go out flipping everyone, audience included, off one last time rather than trying to set out any meaningful closure for the characters or hint at somethings yet to come.

Overall, this special was just as hateful as you would expect. All I can say is at least it is over now

0/5

Pros.

None

Cons.

It shouldn’t exist

It is hateful

It doesn’t offer an ending or any kind of closure

It is obnoxious

It is unfunny

If you enjoyed this review, then please head over to my Patreon to support me, I offer personalized shoutouts, customised film recommendations to suit your personality and tastes, the ability for you to pick what I review next and full access to my Patreon exclusive game reviews. Check it out!

https://www.patreon.com/AnotherMillennialReviewer

Or if you would rather send me a donation if Patreon isn’t for you then please find a link to my donations page below

Help Support My Reviews

Curse of the Crimson Alter

Summary

An antiques dealer, Mark Eden, goes off in search of his missing brother only to become wrapped up in a Lovecraftian horror.

This is perhaps an underrated Christopher Lee caper, and you can see why. Whilst it has some charm with its Lovecraftian horror it feels perhaps the most dated of Lee’s output that I have recently seen. By that I mean the first scene of the film with the creature looks awful, the costume and the lighting both contribute to this. I know that these films were made on a shoe string budget but even still it looks bad.

The plot is also a little thin on the ground as it has the effect of feeling like it is simply a lot of things happening without much rhyme or reason to connect them or make them make sense. Again I gave it some leniency due to the type of film it is, but come the end credits I would be hard pressed not to mention the fact it doesn’t make any coherent sense.

Overall, the sort of budget period horror film that only the most die hard fan could enjoy

2/5

Pros.

Some fun moments

It tries to be different and edgy

Cons.

The horror doesn’t work

It doesn’t make a lot of sense

It is silly when it should be creepy

If you enjoyed this review, then please head over to my Patreon to support me, I offer personalized shoutouts, customised film recommendations to suit your personality and tastes, the ability for you to pick what I review next and full access to my Patreon exclusive game reviews. Check it out!

https://www.patreon.com/AnotherMillennialReviewer

Or if you would rather send me a donation if Patreon isn’t for you then please find a link to my donations page below

Help Support My Reviews

Salem’s Lot: No One Can Do King’s Books Justice

Summary

Another King book is given the straight to streaming treatment.

This film is fine that’s about all I can say about it. It is one of those sort of films that doesn’t stick with you after and that you only half remember watching.

It was an odd choice to give a lot of the characters from the book smaller roles in order to give a story to a new character, clearly they didn’t care much about it being a faithful adaption. I don’t really know why we need the story of a little boy, Jordan Preston Carter, who decides he is going to go and wipe out all the vampires on his own. Perhaps they thought it would get kids to watch.

There are some good scares early on but then it just becomes silly, the vampires are wiping out adults left and right yet this little boy manages to just easily destroy many of them single handedly. This takes away from any sense of fear you might have as you just go ‘oh they were clearly really easy to beat then’. It also makes the adult characters look weak and stupid.

Overall, a serviceable if weak adaption.

2.5/5

Pros.

It is watchable

It has some good moments

It pays some faith to the book

Cons.

It makes bad changes to the book as well

It focuses too much on a random kid

It makes the vampires seem weak

If you enjoyed this review, then please head over to my Patreon to support me, I offer personalized shoutouts, customised film recommendations to suit your personality and tastes, the ability for you to pick what I review next and full access to my Patreon exclusive game reviews. Check it out!

https://www.patreon.com/AnotherMillennialReviewer

Or if you would rather send me a donation if Patreon isn’t for you then please find a link to my donations page below

Help Support My Reviews

Interview With Matthew I. Schmidt: Writer and Director Of Mr Sandman

I recently sat down with Matthew I. Schmidt to talk about his new film MR Sandman, in the interview we talk about horror, jump scares and scariest of all contact lens.

AMR: What Is your favourite horror film?

MS: My favourite horror film is the Exorcist though my favourite all round film is Jaws and many people do consider that a horror film.

AMR: What films inspired you when making this film?

MS: When I was making this a lot of The Shining came into play with certain slow camera moments that I used, a lot of Poltergeist definitely a lot of Poltergeist came into play, such as the little girl in the bed, the storms, certain camera angles from that too. The fear of being in bed and stuff moving around the room like with the little boy from Poltergeist.

Another obvious influence is of course A Nightmare On Elm Street what with the whole dream factor.

AMR: How would you say your film adds to the horror genre?

MS: I think this film adds to the horror genre in the sense that though you have films like A Nightmare On Elms Street I don’t think in horror, or in cinema in general, touches on dreams enough. I think that the ‘dream world’ is a very underused platform for movies in general, but for horror it just doesn’t seem to be used enough as the main platform, I know that characters have nightmares in films, horror or otherwise, but it never seems to be the main platform of the ‘dreamworld’ or the combination of that with the childhood fear of the dark.

AMR: What is one thing you love about modern horror filmmaking and one thing you hate?

MS: With modern horror movies I can’t help but think about the James Wan style, and I would say the visuals these days have been very impressive with regard to films like Insidious with the demons, or maybe The Nun or the Conjuring two.

I think the visuals in these films have been really strong and impactful, I think they are using darkness well as well as how sometimes the demonic character will just stare and that builds tension.

What I don’t like is when modern horror movies use CGI. Whilst I love CGI I think it has a place such as in a superhero film, but in horror movies I think it comes off as cartoonish and I think keeping the creature, whatever it may be, in the dark and using subtly when it comes to creating scares is more effective as opposed to an over the top and in your face CGI creations. I think too much CGI in horror is bad, it does have it uses such as if you want to create a shadow or when practical effects fall short, but when it is overdone that is a bad thing.

AMR: What was your favourite moment from the film and your favourite moment from shooting it?

MS: I am a little hard press to think of my favourite moment from the film but I am thinking about my favourite shot, and it was when we were above the bed and mother and daughter are in bed and we move in on them as she slowly strokes her hair, and I just think that the way it came out with the sound effects made for a beautiful tense moment. That might have been my favourite sequence from the film it really stood out to me and I was very happy with that.

My favourite moment shooting had to be Grandma’s monologue because it was early on in the production and we were shooting it and she was just nailing it so well and I just felt like if nothing else this is coming together well and I felt really excited when we did that.

AMR: Do you have any funny on set stories?

MS: A funny on set story probably has to do with the white contacts that the mum had to wear when she was possessed or at least in the dream possessed, we were struggling with them a lot and found it difficult to put them in, when we did manage to get it into her eye it got stuck, it wasn’t funny at the time.

I went into panic mode and so did the actress and I thought was she going to need to go to the emergency room, and as we were panicking she blinked and her eye lid seemingly moved the lens right into place and I was so happy and relieved. She later made me promise to never have her use contacts again.

AMR: Are you a believer or a sceptic in the supernatural

MS: I am a believer in possibilities, I have experienced two things in my life that I can’t explain, but I am very much an evidence person and always look for a logical explanation. I think it is arrogant to say we know it all, I definitely believe in possibilities and because I believe in an afterlife I am open to the idea that we could be visited.

AMR: How scary would you say your film is?

MS: That is hard to say as it is up to an audience to say how scary it is, however, I try and draw on primal fears such as the fear of the dark as these never go out of fashion. These sort of fears are relatable to everyone as everyone watching it will have been a child suffering those fears at some point.

It is always hard to say how effective something is as a filmmaker as you can think it works whereas the audience can not, however, from the feedback we have received so far and it has only been a relatively small sampling due to it only being out for two weeks we have been told that the film is creepy and that it takes people back to childhood. The way I wanted to be touching on those childhood fears bringing people back like oh I’ve been there or  I did that or I’ve experienced that.

AMR: Where do you fall on the atmosphere vs jump scares debate within horror at the moment?

MS: I didn’t realise there was a debate, I mean I think they’re both effective I think that jump scares and slow burns are just as effective just in different ways one of my favourite horror films Exorcist 3 has what I consider the greatest jump scare in movie history and if you don’t know what scene I am referring to, you probably do, but it’s the hallway scene where the hooded figure comes out with the sheers to attack the nurse.

So jump scares when done right can be extremely effective like anything else, I remember the first time I saw Scream at that point the world had been burnt out on slasher films so we weren’t expecting much from it and then all of a sudden we realised wow this is self-aware but the great thing is that they’re also using a lot of jump scares to keep you on the edge of your seat so you’re laughing but you’re jumping at the same time. I was 21 at the time yeah I’m showing my age. I remember me and my friend were walking home from the movie theatre and there were hedges everywhere on the way home because we grew up in a suburban environment and before I crossed each hedge I had a little peak round the corner because I was feeling a little jumpy.  I was like wow like the jump scares were really effective so I I find jump scares very effective when done correctly.

I myself prefer myself a more story driven experience, but I can’t say Scream wasn’t story driven as it was one of the most brilliant screenplays I’ve ever come across but you know I  do prefer a little bit more of a slow burn like the Shining or the Exorcist or to give you a modern example Hereditary. This is because it really just sinks in more, the jump scare  almost more like popcorn fun you know it gets you edgy but it is popcorn fun you know once you’ve seen the film it a few times you cease to jump as much more as a slow burn tends to stay with you longer. This is not a put down in any way shape or form but it is more of a sugar high then let’s just say a big satisfying meal that keeps you full longer. You know Hitchcock has a brilliant quote and I’m going to paraphrase it because I don’t know exactly how he would word it but he basically said the kill is only there to show you that there’s a real threat the real fear is in the build-up in the suspense and I I very much agree with that statement.

AMR: Do you have any upcoming films you would like to talk about?

As far as upcoming projects we really just released this a couple of weeks ago so I mentally I somewhat need a break from creating be ú…cause it is hard when you’re working a full time job and taking on next these things but I do have some general ideas in my head just nothing developed yet.

AMR: Do you have any advice for upcoming filmmakers who might be reading this?

Console makers are few things number one swing back take the chance who cares if your first attempt fails because anybody who says anything or makes fun of you they’re just showing that they didn’t have the guts to try it themselves and I’ve taken plenty of jabs and ribbing and stuff from my friends and coworkers and stuff like that on my especially on my early attempts but then when you get and that’s usually when they’re in groups but when you get them alone they always say hey you know what you put yourself out there and I admire that you know what as I’ve improved as a filmmaker you know they’ve come around so don’t worry about what people think swing the bat take the chance if this is something you’re passionate about.

Now the other piece of advice I would give you is and this is more on the technical side if you have a few different ideas of in your head let’s just say how to and the scene or start a scene or you know some alternative versions of the scene shoot as much as you can without you know going crazy give yourself options because when you get to the editing phase you were going to thank yourself that you have those options because sometimes the movie can take on a life of its own and when you get to the editing phase which is really where the movie comes together one thing they fit a lot more than something you shot that you thought would fit in the tone of what you’re trying to say so as much as it’s practical infeasible film alternatives.

Last but not least whatever you decide to film you know I I would say 2 rules 1 practical 11 not so not so much about practical but more about passion film what you can don’t try to don’t try your first time now too you know make something out of your reach like a big budget situation that’s supposed to look big budget but you know it’s not going to look like that because you have limited resources at it as a first time film maker and the second part of that is film with you know film something you’re passionate about so if it is hard great I’m passionate about horror but I love all genres but film what you’re passionate about because if your passion your love and care for the project is going to come through in the final product so be passionate about what you’re doing film what you really want to be filming not something that you just agree to the get your first time film out or something you thought people might like you know to do what you’re passionate about and that will come through

If you would like to check the film out for yourself head on over to the link below

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9gVIOGjl8_8

If you are a filmmaker and you would like me to review your film and or do interviews with you about it to provide additional insights and context then either email me or contact me on social media. There is no barrier to entry I will review any film.

If you enjoyed this review, then please head over to my Patreon to support me, I offer personalized shoutouts, customised film recommendations to suit your personality and tastes, the ability for you to pick what I review next and full access to my Patreon exclusive game reviews. Check it out!

https://www.patreon.com/AnotherMillennialReviewer

Or if you would rather send me a donation if Patreon isn’t for you then please find a link to my donations page below

Help Support My Reviews