The Fall Guy: The Best Blockbuster That We Have Been Given In Years

Written by Luke Barnes

Summary

A stuntman, Ryan Gosling, must go through hell and highwater in order to solve the mystery of an actors disappearance and reunite with his lost love, Emily Blunt.

I would argue though it will be a controversial opinion that Blunt and Gosling have better chemistry here than he did with Margot Robbie last year in Barbie. I think the film is made all the better for their relationship being front and centre to the film as the love story aspect really gives you something to root for and hold onto during the film.

I also liked that this film felt like a push back against a lot of the worst trends of recent Hollywood blockbusters, there was no dumb over the top CGI fight, the characters had humour and felt like real people, and crucially there was little to no identity politics. There was a line about toxic masculinity which was played for laughs and said by the villain of the piece to show how it was just another way to manipulate people into going along with her.

This film felt like in many ways the sort of film we used to get 10 years ago, before Hollywood decided to tie its fate to left wing politics and repeat every social justice buzz word they have heard online for points alienating half their audience in the process. You could argue in many senses that Blunt’s character here is a girl boss trope done right, she is in charge yet she also is allowed to have emotions and not be perfect, which makes a change from the self-serious, stoic, no nonsense girl bosses we often see, or the I’m so random iteration of the girl boss.

I would say my main issue with the film was that the second act went on for far too long and became bloated. If it had been better paced the film would have naturally flowed a lot better.

Overall, a solid and fun blockbuster

4/5

Pros.

It is fun

It doesn’t take itself too seriously

The stunts

The characters are likeable

Cons.

The second act is bloated   

If you enjoyed this review, then please head over to my Patreon to support me, I offer personalized shoutouts, customised film recommendations to suit your personality and tastes, the ability for you to pick what I review next and full access to my Patreon exclusive game reviews. Check it out!

https://www.patreon.com/AnotherMillennialReviewer

Or if you would rather send me a donation if Patreon isn’t for you then please find a link to my donations page below

Help Support My Reviews

Transformers 40th Anniversary Event: A Glorified DVD Extra

Written by Luke Barnes

Summary

Most of the original cast from the very first Transformers series get back together to rerecord the first few episodes, and you get to watch them do it.

This experience made me realise I am not as big a Transformers fan as I thought I was. It also made me realise the dire state that the Transformers IP is in. Before the proceedings began we got a new look at the upcoming Chris Hemsworth film, which looks awful just awful who wants Megatron and Optimus Prime as slacker pals- no one is the answer. Then we saw a look at some children’s show which looked equally awful, my main takeaway from that was what a horrible to look that sight 3D animation is.

To me this experience which was just the first few episodes stitched back together again just stank of desperation. Paramount knows that it is in trouble, it is considering being bought out, so what does it do to make money it releases this. There is no artistry in this, no need to see it at the cinema, it is just like watching DVD extras at home. The irritating thing about it is that the first few episodes are split-screen between seeing what is happening in the episode and seeing the voice actors reading it out, this is incredibly distracting and I wish they had done it either with just them reading it, no cartoon, or with just the cartoon as is.

The most interesting bit of it was hearing some interviews with the original voice actors but again that was maybe 5 minutes of the wider runtime,

Overall, this feels like Paramount trying to fleece a cinema ticket out of die hard fans, and is nothing more than a glorified DVD extra.

1/5

Pros.

The interviews are entertaining

Cons.

There is not enough time spent talking to the original cast

The episodes are poorly spliced together, they should take out the ad break section to make it feel more cinematic

It is a glorified DVD extra

The split-screen is a bad choice

If you enjoyed this review, then please head over to my Patreon to support me, I offer personalized shoutouts, customised film recommendations to suit your personality and tastes, the ability for you to pick what I review next and full access to my Patreon exclusive game reviews. Check it out!

https://www.patreon.com/AnotherMillennialReviewer

Or if you would rather send me a donation if Patreon isn’t for you then please find a link to my donations page below

Help Support My Reviews

The Bad Batch Season 3 Overview: One Last Time Into The Fire

Written by Luke Barnes

Summary

The Batch are back for one last fight against the Empire.

I would say that this is the best Star Wars related piece of media in a long while. Now I am not saying season 3 is perfect, because there is still a little fat that could have been trimmed off it and a new episodes that felt like filler, such as when they brought back Ventress for no real reason.

However, that aside I thought this season was the best one yet, I think that though we did get some filler, it was far, far less than we had in previous seasons. For the most part the season kept to a terrific pace which kept the tension going throughout, episode double acts such as the one at Rex’s base were incredibly well done and were the best thing I have seen out of Star Wars in a long time.

Moreover, the emotional stakes they managed to create over the course of the season were incredible, I didn’t think they would be able to top the heartbreak that was Tech’s death last season, but they came damn close here. I think the final scene of the series between Hunter and Omega is incredibly powerful and will spark even the toughest Star Wars fan to have a tear in their eye.

Overall, the series ended on a high.

4.5/5

Pros.

The action

The stakes

Where it leaves off

The final charge of the clones

It pays off in so many ways

Cons.

I would have liked to see Rex arrive in the final episode

If you enjoyed this review, then please head over to my Patreon to support me, I offer personalized shoutouts, customised film recommendations to suit your personality and tastes, the ability for you to pick what I review next and full access to my Patreon exclusive game reviews. Check it out!

https://www.patreon.com/AnotherMillennialReviewer

Or if you would rather send me a donation if Patreon isn’t for you then please find a link to my donations page below

Help Support My Reviews

The Dying Age Of The Moviestar

Written by Luke Barnes

In this cinema issues article we are talking about the idea of the movie star in the classic sense, and asking have they become extinct.

So when you think of movie stars of the past George Clooney, Julia Roberts, Brad Pitt, Densel Washington and many others you think of worldwide recognition, you think of everyone knowing who they are, you think of them as almost transcending cinema and genre: this is the bar to movie star as we are setting it out here.

These days you have people like the Rock, Henry Cavill, Charlize Theron and Zendaya, but are any of them movie stars, that is the question. In my opinion, no they aren’t and there are 3 key reasons for that.

The first key point to address here is that the idea of celebrity itself has changed over time, the idea of being famous has been watered down somewhat, so in a bygone time if you were famous you were famous for something, being a musician, a sports person, an artist and actor or a presenter amongst other thing. Whereas now you have streamers and influencers you have reality tv stars, there are more famous people now then at any point in history, but are they really famous, and isn’t the fact that people can now become famous for doing nothing reducing the overall quality of what it means to be famous. As such the idea of celebrity becomes devalued and because there are so many it is hard to standout and reach that point of superstardom that some used to be able to achieve.

Secondly, and directly tied to, you have the idea of fragmentation. So as fandoms have become more and more of a thing society has become divided into niche interest groups, things are less mainstream and widely accessible. For example, for those who are super into wrestling, they may know every wrestlers name and backstory, they are in that fandom, as such these wrestlers are celebrities to them, whereas to the wider world these people are unknowns, you may have a passing interest or know the big high profile wrestlers but other than you don’t know any. As such celebrities can just belong to one sub-group or community, they may be huge and all consuming to them but not outside of it, this again raises questions of what a celebrity is and how we define it. In addition, and this is a tale as old as time, if someone doesn’t leave the pigeonhole they are in and take chances it will affect their celebrity, look at someone like a George Clooney he didn’t stick to one genre he moved around and got different audiences to notice him, therefore he improves his celebrity and more people take notice. Compare that to a Zendaya or the Rock, both have really stayed within their niches and fandom spheres, the Rock has tried to dabble with different genres but has mainly stayed within ones that boost his persona as an action hero, which is fine but it doesn’t get him in front of new audiences. Whereas Zendaya has moved from angsty dramas to try and do superheroes and science fiction, to limited success, and in a sense you could argue that she is being more adventurous then the rock, but there are still genres she hasn’t gone to yet which could boost her celebrity. Look at Will Smith, before the slap, he had done drama and prestige, rom-coms, comedies, science fiction, horror, action, superheroes, sports movies, thrillers, animated films, musicals and westerns, the man had range. Whereas today’s stars are too scared to try and branch out.

Then thirdly you have the politicisation of what it means to be a celebrity now. The famous actors of the past would just talk about their movies, they didn’t think they were activists, they didn’t pander to them they just wanted to make good movies. In doing this they had a wide appeal, people on both the left and the right liked Will Smith and the reason for that was that he didn’t divide people with politics, he didn’t comment on hot button issues and go if you disagree with me don’t watch my movies I hate you. Stars today didn’t get that memo and such know every red carpet is a lineup of millionaire narcissistic babies who a lot of the time don’t even understand what they are endorsing or condoning reading out pre-paired statements that they have memorised or reciting buzz words in an effort to seem like an activist and get some social media points. You cannot fully blame them for this as again they have a team of people and publicists and what not that could vet what they are going to say before they say it, but they either don’t or don’t see the career damage of being an activist. Let’s look at two high profile examples of what I am talking about where actors got political and it cost them. The examples in question being that of Rachel Zegler who said how problematic by modern standards Snow White, a remake of which she is starring in, and then Brie Larson who did her famous I don’t care what a white dude thinks about a Wrinkle In Time rant. Both of these examples made sections of the viewing public turn against them, by talking about politics or by criticising a beloved classic to many people they both suffered a huge backlash and became hate figures. Captain Marvel starring Larson would be big, because it was between two Avengers films, but look at her career post that, she has had two cameos, a documentary film, a short film, the biggest flop in the MCU with her Captain Marvel sequel and has been a small role in the new Fast film, her post Endgame career highlight, and has mainly pivoted to Youtube and TV on the flip look at Zegler who post her Snow White comments is facing down a boycott of the film, and again isn’t exactly swamped with new offers, she has a pre-comments animated film on the horizon and the aforementioned Snow White film. Why aren’t they getting bigger roles, well because Hollywood knows they can’t unify the audience only divide it.

Finally, a bonus reason for you why movie stars are dying off is because of stan culture, some actors have stan communities that are incredibly toxic and vicious, these communities are not only not welcoming but in a sense gatekeep the wider public from that actor and therefore stop the social media reach they could have in becoming more internationally famous.

If you enjoyed this piece, then please head over to my Patreon to support me, I offer personalized shoutouts, customised film recommendations to suit your personality and tastes, the ability for you to pick what I review next and full access to my Patreon exclusive game reviews. Check it out!

https://www.patreon.com/AnotherMillennialReviewer

Or if you would rather send me a donation if Patreon isn’t for you then please find a link to my donations page below

Help Support My Reviews

Boy Kills World: Bob Tries Out Some New Techniques In The Kitchen

Written by Luke Barnes

Summary

A young man, Bill Skarsgard, goes on a quest for revenge in an odd and absurdist world.

This film feels like it would have worked a lot better as a videogame, in almost every way it feels like a tongue in cheek, silly but also taking itself seriously videogame. As it stands it has problems and won’t work for a lot of people, the main reason for this is because the tone is just so jarring, there are moments where you are like okay this is a comedy and then others where you think it’s a drama, and plenty of films can wed these two things together but not this one, they make it feel tonally like two different films.

The third act plot twist adds to this it takes what could easily have been a pretty straight forward narrative and it twists it into being convoluted and just silly. The idea that the main character is the villain’s son and he has been trained to kill her after being abducted by his master who then wiped his memory of it all, just makes everything start to make no sense at all.

The positives I have for the film is that the violence and the fights are well done and feel very Wick esque, they are quick and brutal and you feel every minute of them. In that vein I wanted to say how both Jessica Rothe and Sharlto Copley stand out here, the former for her strong action skills and how she was able to give a character behind a mask a strong sense of personality and identity and the latter because he always enhances any film he is in.

Overall, though I am a big H. John Benjamin fan even he couldn’t save whatever this was.

2/5

Pros.

The action

Rothe and Copley

Cons.

Tonally it is a mess

The twist

It goes on for too long

If you enjoyed this review, then please head over to my Patreon to support me, I offer personalized shoutouts, customised film recommendations to suit your personality and tastes, the ability for you to pick what I review next and full access to my Patreon exclusive game reviews. Check it out!

https://www.patreon.com/AnotherMillennialReviewer

Or if you would rather send me a donation if Patreon isn’t for you then please find a link to my donations page below

Help Support My Reviews

Renegade Nell Series Overview: The Most Tame Supposedly Edgy Show You Will Ever Watch

Written by Luke Barnes

Summary

A young woman, Louisa Harland, is accused of a murder she didn’t commit so becomes a highwaywoman for some reason.

When you see headlines about Disney + still being far behind their subscriber targets, and still miles away from Netflix, this is why.

A series that is based around one thing, people being shocked that a highwayman is in fact a woman. There is a very memeable scene in the trailer where people audibly gasp because of the fact that she is a woman and they can’t handle it. Even in the more gender norm times of the past I cannot believe that this was that shocking, it is well documented that there were female pirates and female warriors throughout history, so the idea that people would be shocked at a female highwayman is ridiculous.  It is all based out of this idea of oh these progressive shows are being edgy and challenging the patriarchy and all this, yet the fact of the matter is that the moment for these sort of shows was about 5-10 years ago, they have now both outstayed their welcome and are also behind the times. Most people would accept a show about a highwaywoman and not question it these days, you do not need to keep reminding the audience that she is a woman we are past that.

Moreover, much like with Disney’s other recent YA fare such as Percy Jackson and Spiderwick, this just feels like generic historical fantasy dross to try and get teens in the door. I would argue it is a bit too tame for that, if they wanted to get the teen audience in they need more sex, look at the CW that brought in teens, supposedly, and that was chocked full of it.

The narrative is just another boring girlboss story and Harland cannot bring the same charm to bear she did in Derry Girls, on a creative level this is a failure. The worst thing about this show is just how dated it feels, if it had come out in the era of Batwoman then it would have fit right in, but that age has past.

Overall, more wasted Disney money.

Pros.

It is unintentionally hilarious

Cons.

The girlboss narrative

It is not shocking or novel

The joke of but she is a woman and people fall over in disbelief doesn’t make sense and it is dumb

The acting isn’t good

If you enjoyed this review, then please head over to my Patreon to support me, I offer personalized shoutouts, customised film recommendations to suit your personality and tastes, the ability for you to pick what I review next and full access to my Patreon exclusive game reviews. Check it out!

https://www.patreon.com/AnotherMillennialReviewer

Or if you would rather send me a donation if Patreon isn’t for you then please find a link to my donations page below

Help Support My Reviews

How Disney Is Quickly Becoming The Most Hated Studio In Hollywood

Written by Luke Barnes

In this cinema issues article we are talking about the dire state of Disney and how they are facing down a pretty dismal future and why that is.

On paper Disney should be doing well, they have some many classic film franchises, and are well known and in some quarters beloved across the world, and yet at the 2023 box office they had more bombs than any other studio. Moreover, their reputation is so low at the moment that they are having to turn off the comments on their trailers as people are tearing into them and down voting them into oblivion.

So the question is why? Honestly, there isn’t much of any one answer to that there are quite a few and I’ll try to get to what I view as the main few in this piece.

I think the main reason people have turned on Disney is because they represent quantity over quality, they are churning out sequels, prequels and remakes no one wants. They are either using the wrong algorithm or betting hard on nostalgia that doesn’t seem to be coming together in this regard. Look at their upcoming Lion King live action sequel, it has already been down voted to hell and why? Not because it is offensive or even super bad but because it looks soulless and no one wants it, in many respects this comes off as them being entirely out of touch which you could argue almost all of Hollywood is right now. Moreover, in the investors call Bob Iger said that they are content mining, which really reflects how Disney view these properties not as something to be stewarded and looked after but rather something they can make a quick buck out of, and obviously it’s the movie business so you expect things like this, but you don’t expect them to say it.

Another reason why people are turning on Disney and this crosses over with the idea they are out of touch is that they push political messages constantly and towards kids. Film and TV can and often does have political messages and that’s fine but you have to also expect the blowback and the drop off, the idea is that you care so much about the thing you are out there preaching that you don’t care people are leaving. Many people are angry for what they see as Disney pushing out incredibly progressive messaging in their content, which doesn’t line up with a lot of its audience believe, this is the issue with commenting on hot button issues in your content, you create a divide. Moreover, to then go out of your way to call your fans names and try and shame them for not having the same politics as you is another good way to lose business. It seems though not in the immediate term that Disney have learnt this lesson and are trying to get out of the culture war, as they have issued a number of statements saying how they are walking away from the message, but we will have to wait and see.

Finally the third reason I think Disney is loathed at the moment is the idea of audience homogenisation. It is well known that Disney have taken things like Marvel or Star Wars things that have always been traditionally male brands and have tried to make them appeal more to women in the idea of having a wider audience share and making more money. They have done other things with other franchises again in order to try and grow the audience as well, but as it has started to come out with things like Madame Web these tactics don’t work, rather than get a new audience in whilst also retaining your old audience, your old audience ends up feeling alienated and leaves and you don’t get in enough new people to replace them.

If I were Disney I would clean house, they need to get rid of a lot of people that are pushing these sort of ideas, I would go back to making films and tv shows people want, I would listen to fans of their franchises in a meaningful way, I would keep politics out of it or get writers who can handle it in a way that doesn’t feel so heavy handed and I would keep my franchises aimed at the demographics that had made them popular and not try and bring in anyone else as I would know it would alienate the original fans.

If you enjoyed this piece, then please head over to my Patreon to support me, I offer personalized shoutouts, customised film recommendations to suit your personality and tastes, the ability for you to pick what I review next and full access to my Patreon exclusive game reviews. Check it out!

https://www.patreon.com/AnotherMillennialReviewer

Or if you would rather send me a donation if Patreon isn’t for you then please find a link to my donations page below

Help Support My Reviews

Sasaki and Peeps Season Overview

Written by Luke Barnes

Summary

A man and his bird travel between a magical fantasy world and our modern world.

There is a lot to love about the first season of Sasaki and Peeps, it is wholesome has great character dynamics and a massive world that is just calling out to be explored. I think the mix between different anime genres works well, and that there is not jar between high fantasy elements and more action or horror elements set on Earth.

I think the show is accessible and relatable to anyone who has ever had a pet, as the bond between Sasaki and Peeps is strong and very heart warming at times. I would say the show is worth watching for that alone, in times like these you need all the wholesome content you can get.

The one thing I would say is that the show can be at times a little too high concept, there is not enough time given to either the fantasy or modern storyline, and because the show is introducing so much and moving quickly you can become lost at times. Moreover, by trying to do so much it means that certain aspects don’t get their proper due.

Overall, a good first season with a lot of promise but hopefully for season two it will slow down somewhat.

4/5

Pros.

It is funny

It has wholesome moments that are nice

The worldbuilding

A wide cast of likeable characters

Cons

It rushes through things at times

If you enjoyed this review, then please head over to my Patreon to support me, I offer personalized shoutouts, customised film recommendations to suit your personality and tastes, the ability for you to pick what I review next and full access to my Patreon exclusive game reviews. Check it out!

https://www.patreon.com/AnotherMillennialReviewer

Or if you would rather send me a donation if Patreon isn’t for you then please find a link to my donations page below

Help Support My Reviews

Abigail: A Little Girl Taking Down Grown Men

Written by Luke Barnes

Summary

A group of people kidnap a little girl, and are met with bad consequences.

A preface, I do not support Melissa Barrea or her anti-Semitic nonsense, I have been very vocal about that. As such I did not see this film at the cinema, and debated even affording it this review as my coverage might give it and her undeserved attention, however, it was playing at an event I attended recently, post its home release, so I saw it there. I am glad to say I did not give any of my money to the film or her. There is no place in this world for antisemitism.

That aside let’s move on.

This film was an odd one, I went into it expecting it to be more of a horror film yet it played more like a horror comedy. There were certainly moments that you could see it attempting to be scary, but whenever it did this it then interrupted it by having a joke or a silly moment, it was like it was too afraid to take itself seriously.

Alisha Weir is good in the role of Abigal, both of the innocent victim and also as the monster. However, what I think is an incredibly odd choice narratively is that they undermine her by having her dad show up at the end, which makes her look a lot less powerful and secondary. The film is called Abigal she should have stayed the big bad.

Overall, it has some good moments and some funny lines, sadly the comedy undermines the horror somewhat as the two tones don’t match well here and Abigal who could have been a great villain is undermined.

2/5

Pros.

Some good moments

It is reasonably paced

Cons.

It undermines its villain

Tonally it doesn’t work

It feels a bit familiar

If you enjoyed this review, then please head over to my Patreon to support me, I offer personalized shoutouts, customised film recommendations to suit your personality and tastes, the ability for you to pick what I review next and full access to my Patreon exclusive game reviews. Check it out!

https://www.patreon.com/AnotherMillennialReviewer

Or if you would rather send me a donation if Patreon isn’t for you then please find a link to my donations page below

Help Support My Reviews

The Death And Destruction Of Doctor Who As A Franchise: It Is Over Folks

Written by Luke Barnes

In this cinema issues article we are talking about how Doctor Who has become a sorry husk or shadow of its former self

Now a quick warning before we get into it, if you cannot handle someone else’s opinion, particularly one you disagree with then you need to stop reading this review and reflect on why that is and maybe get some help. I am allowed my opinion on Doctor Who as you are yours, sending me some death threats because you can’t stand what I am saying is not going to stop me and it just makes you look bad.

That out of the way lets begin, so a quick heads up I have not watched the first two episodes of the new season of Doctor Who and I don’t plan to, I have spoken to people who have and gleamed their opinions, and I have seen clips from it.

However, it seems my previous writing on Doctor Who and RTD was entirely right, I am have been quite vindicated with the latest episodes by all accounts. Doctor Who is no longer about time and space adventures but rather pushing a political message at the audience over and over again until they are begging for it to stop. Case in point there is a scene in the recent two episodes wherein one character brings another to task over their misuse of pronouns, why is this needed.

I have seen some commentary saying that this show is fighting in the culture wars and trying to fight back against growing right wing thought and all this, but I don’t think it is that deep, I just think RTD liked that he got attention for It’s A Sin so decided to keep doing that. My question ultimately with this show is who is it for now. What’s more where has the Disney money gone as the monsters and effects still look as bad as ever.

To add to all this the fanbase has been pretty split, but what is not helping is that we have already seen a number of people involved with the production calling out the fans and saying they are bigots of varying sorts. This does not buy you any good will and instead looks like a show that is insecure and knows that it doesn’t have the viewing figures to feel confident so has to try and shift the narrative. As again I predicted when these new seasons of Who not only don’t save the series but instead kill it for another 20+ years, they need someone to blame.

Despite it being all over my feed this will be the last I will be commenting on the show, but I will say this to you, why watch a show that doesn’t want you to watch it, are you a fan, if so the cast and creatives think you’re toxic, and personally I will not reward them with my rating figure and so will boycott the show. Expect more screaming about how evil the fans are before it gets cancelled for good next year.

If you enjoyed this piece, then please head over to my Patreon to support me, I offer personalized shoutouts, customised film recommendations to suit your personality and tastes, the ability for you to pick what I review next and full access to my Patreon exclusive game reviews. Check it out!

https://www.patreon.com/AnotherMillennialReviewer

Or if you would rather send me a donation if Patreon isn’t for you then please find a link to my donations page below

Help Support My Reviews